Holy crap, that’s a lot of work to get a roll of filament. That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing. Ugh.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    tbf, you wouldn’t do this because it’s cheaper, you’d do it because it’s more ecologically friendly and it helps make your 3d printer a bit more sustainable.

    But at 20 bucks for a spool of thread, you won’t be coming out ahead economically by recycling, I agree.

    • dawnerd@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’d be fun to mess around with if it wasn’t 12-18k for the setup.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s also not more ecologically friendly – you’ve gotta use near 80% virgin material with 20% regrind for a good quality product. All you’re doing is bringing its production into your house on a smaller, more inefficient scale. And then you’re paying this dipshit here $20k so you can save $5 on your 1kg of PLA.

      To be fair, however, it is good if you’re testing small batches of filament formulations because you’re running an actual production line though.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        ngl, I’ve never tried it and I doubt I’m about to start, so prints go into the recycle bin so they can get dumped in the landfill with the rest of the recycling.

        But at the very least, it’s a better practice to use PLA as your main choice.

        • thantik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Strangely enough, ABS is better for the environment, as it’s one of the few actual materials that get recycled…

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, the ecologically friendly option is to send it to the recycling.

  • rasterweb@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “That’s only economical if your time is worth nothing.” Well, we should all be able to live lives where we can pursue things that do not have monetary rewards. Obviously not everyone is in that position but perhaps for David Florian exploring and learning and trying things is what makes him happy. Of course for him it probably makes money as well, even if indirectly. The fact that his video got shared means more people will see it, and more views means more money, so there’s the value for David Florian. It’s also worth considering that in science, it’s all about trying things and gathering information that will hopefully lead to new (and hopefully lower cost) capabilities.

  • stalfoss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    To be fair, most hobby 3d printing is only economical if your time is worth nothing

    • GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      True, in some sense. However, I can’t get a lot of the things that I can 3d print. There’s literally no way to buy them.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone at McGill university figured out how to recycle wind turbine blades into 3d printer filament. However, a single blade made enough filament that it’s length could go to the moon and back. From one blade!

        • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Post: “My hot end is only reaching earth’s mantle. Do I need to reach the surface of the sun to make this work?”

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not to be like that… but… gases would be hard to print, I’m not sure why you’d want to….

          Liquids could be interesting, for like, ice sculptures. But at that point you’d be having to extract heat from ambient… drop the build chamber below freezing

            • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Eh. That could work, might be more complicated though.

              I’m envisioning a freezer for an enclosure, then heat the water to just above melting. This would allow using essentially-fdm set ups on the printer itself.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes. Well they are mixed with an epoxy.

        You can find the research online with all the details.

      • thantik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Glass reinforcement material is a common filler, just as much as carbon fiber.