After Boebert’s Beetlejuice embarrassment, Adam Frisch hopes he can wrestle the Colorado congresswoman’s seat from her

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        His platform is very lackluster. He’s basically running on not being her. :-/

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          33
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Interesting … because let’s be honest, that’s pretty much enough reason for most people to vote for him

        • n0m4n@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          When your opponent is making a series of bad decisions, that is enough. People really are sick and tired of the blatant BS.

            • TheHiddenCatboy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m reading the document provided by killeeronthecorner. This is what I see:

              • He will fight for Western Colorado water rights.
              • He will push for an ‘all of the above’ energy plan which likely includes solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, and petrochemical.
              • He will push for farmer-friendly policies, which ties to the above plus opposing ‘bad’ regulations and opening markets.
              • He will take actions in support of small businesses.
              • Opposing ‘bad’ regulations, again.
              • Job Training.
              • Upgrade (presumably power and internet) infrastructure
              • He will tackle inflation (albeit without a good plan on how to deal with the current causes of inflation…)
              • He is pro-choice.
              • He is pro-environmentalism.

              He’s definitely a blue-dog Democrat, more conservative than I’d like, but this is CO-03 we’re talking about. You’re NOT going to get a progressive firebrand to represent that district. You’re going to get somebody who is on the Conservative end of the spectrum. Getting a Pro-Choice Moderate Democrat who is in any way open to Green policies in the district that includes Farmers and Oil Men and places like Rifle would be a godsend, considering the person who CURRENTLY represents CO-03 is rabidly anti-choice and quite interested in pushing radical MAGA policies. You get what you can take out of a place like CO-03.

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I mean, I think we’re too late to prevent global environmental catastrophe, but we should try hard. Otoh, I understand you.

        • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve looked at the republican candidates in my local elections the last few years and that’s pretty much the entirety of their platforms. Most of their websites literally listed zero platform at all, it’s annoying as hell

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine thinking that just because a paper is available on the web, the editorial style isn’t dictated by its domestic audience.

          I expect you will also be shocked that when they reference ‘The Prime Minister’ they quite often don’t even bother to reference which country’s prime minister they are taking about. Shocking, eh?

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m in the US and, surprisingly, I’m seeing it. Weird place. It’s like we have this web around the world connecting people. Maybe we could call it the Global Net, or GN for short.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yes, I sort of guess led you were American. I think the giveaway is the assumption that everyone globally should know the the minutiae of American domestic politics, and the shock that minor political figures might not be known by name.

          • Cethin@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but if you’re writting an article on them you at least think it’s important enough to write an article on them. I don’t think anyone outside of the US, or even outside Colorado, should care about this, but the author here did. If it’s that important to them, the least they could do is include the name in the headline. Either that or it isn’t important and both the creation of this article, as well as the posting of it, was a complete waste of time. Idk which one it is.

            • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              No. Because the purpose of the article is to bring the person to the reader’s attention for the first time. It is ‘here is this person who is new to you, who has doing something interesting’.

              They might come out of the article knowing the person’s name, but they are not going into it that way, so leading on the name would be a failure of a headline

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have relatives in western Colorado. My impression is that folks there are more than a little tired of being “Boebert Country”. Being tangled up in Trumpie stuff has not done them any good, and it has saddled them with a stigma that they now have to work their way out of.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Adam Frisch is in his second congressional campaign, crossing and re-crossing Colorado’s third US House district, a space bigger than Pennsylvania.

    Boebert, a former restaurant owner and proud grandmother at 36, is the far-right Republican who won the seat in 2020 and has proven relentlessly controversial since – so much so that last year, even in a conservative district, she survived Frisch’s first challenge by the skin of her teeth.

    But last month a bigger blaze flared up, when the congresswoman was shown to have behaved outrageously during a performance of the musical Beetlejuice in Denver.

    “When I looked at the data a couple of years ago,” Frisch says, “I saw that Marjorie Taylor Greene, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz, Paul Gosar and Andy Biggs are all kind of a part of that Republican chaos crowd, and I would put [Ilhan] Omar and [Rashida] Tlaib [leftwing Democrats from Minnesota and Michigan] on the other side.

    Therefore, while Boebert plays to the cameras in Washington – Frisch hits her for having a “mini television studio in her office, where there are supposed to be benches for constituents to sit before they actually have a chance to talk to the congresswoman” – her opponent continues to tour the battleground.

    Colorado district three tilts conservative but Frisch sees a “very libertarian” conservatism which he, an aspirant “Blue Dog” or “Problem Solvers” moderate in Congress, can work with.


    The original article contains 992 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 77%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why did I think this was Brian Kilmeade when I first saw the picture?