• Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      How about wealth taxes instead. You know, like what we’re already doing with property taxes?

      Income taxes disproportionately affect the poorest in society.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then the solution is to make the existing income tax more progressive than it already is, not just throw it away.

        • TrenchcoatFullOfBats@belfry.rip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          More progressive, close the loopholes, fund the IRS properly so they are actually able to prosecute tax cheats (usually wealthy), set a cap on tax money that can go to the military and outlaw any tax cuts that primarily benefit the top 3 tiers within 3 years of an election.

        • n2burns@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Wealth and income are related, but are not the same thing. Wealth is assets while Income is earnings. Wealth could come from saving/investing income, but it can also come from “unearned income” like the appreciation of assets.

          I personally don’t support Wealth Taxes because wherever they’ve been implements, they’ve had limited effects. I’ve yet to hear a good plan for how to execute a Wealth Tax and haven’t heard good answers for questions like, “Do we allow for depreciation of wealth?” and if so, “How do we avoid that turning into a tax loophole.”

          Either way, wealth and income aren’t the same thing.