• enoqe@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      11 months ago

      I am not a lawyer, but my first thought is that you cannot pass a six figure (or more) fine for this kind of infraction. Even though Trump is starting to show a pattern of disregarding this specific case’s proceedings, the judge would have to start at a reasonable amount and go up from there. In this case, I searched for reasonable fines for violating a gag order and got $1000 to $10000. If he handed down a $500,000 fine then the media / right would go crazy questioning if this fine was justified by Trump’s actions. I think we all know that regardless of the sum (barring $100,000+ fines), Trump is gonna disregard the fine and do it again. But doing so gets Trump closer to actually being imprisoned (in theory). The actual threat of being imprisoned is far more likely to quiet Trump than a monetary fee. ‘Tis the life of the (comparatively) rich, monetary fines don’t have the same sticking power as for you and I.

      • sparr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        There are many other countries, including some with some shared legal history with the US, where civil fines are proportional to the income and/or wealth of the person. Rich people get four or five or six figure traffic tickets, etc.

      • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        All gag orders are not equal. Given this one was due to what amounts to a threat against his staff, I find it unlikely most judges in other circumstances would have let this happen with such flagrant disregard for the order without jail time. The fact is, Trump supporters are violent, and this judge is scared of that violence. A slap on the wrist is all he had the courage to do, and I’m doubtful anything will change with this judge going forward. He just knows how appalling it is to have his hard working and innocent staff threatened and reacted like someone with a spine momentarily, and then he realized he doesn’t have one and walked it back.

        The entire thing is theater.

        • havocpants@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          All gag orders are not equal. Given this one was due to what amounts to a threat against his staff, I find it unlikely most judges in other circumstances would have let this happen with such flagrant disregard for the order without jail time.

          This is the bit I don’t get, Trump doxxing court staff and encouraging his followers to harass them is surely way beyond contempt of court. Is that not an entirely new crime by itself?

          • WoahWoah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You’d think so, but like we’re seeing with the Jim Jordan thing, people are quite honestly (and reasonably) scared of escalating violence and harassment from… punishing the incitement of violence and harassment. The problem comes from the fact that you can’t stop the escalation that will occur simply by punishing the inciter–you make it worse. That’s why mob violence and stochastic terrorism are so scary.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Judges parenting baby Trump:

    I’m gonna count to 3!

    1…

    2…

    2 and a half…

    2 and three quarters…

    almost 3…

    seriously really almost 3…

    • dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      You’re not wrong, but there is a reason for it. The judge(s) are trying to show that they gave Trump every chance to follow their orders before throwing him in jail. It may have seemed like a really like time to us, but by court standards it’s not.

  • Veneroso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Never in the history of our country has a president been indicted so many times. Over so many many alleged crimes. Truly a rigged two tiered just system allowing an indicted former president, storing TS/SCI documents in his bathroom, who has a history of over sharing, and flushing government documents, could remain free, instead of immured in a black-site hole, in pre-trial detainment. Reality Winner was sentenced to five years and three months and she didn’t even get to share how close our submarines could get to Russian Subs without being detected. For shame!

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      so many many alleged crimes.

      This isn’t a court of law and you aren’t a corporation. You’re allowed to acknowledge his thoroughly proven (and in some cases even brag-admitted) guilt for what it is. Nobody’s going to sue you for telling the truth and nobody reasonable is going to complain either.

      • neptune@dmv.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most prominently, Trump is a public figure, so a lawsuit would have to prove malice intent.

        I can say Trump is guilty all day long because I have free political speech, and honest intent.

    • many_bees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      To be fair, a decent amount of presidents probably should have been indicted. Trump does take the cake on how directly connected he is to obvious crimes. He’s definitely the dumbest in that regard.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Stop making empty threats. If this had been anyone else, they would have been in jail years ago. But we’re a nation of corrupt men and not of laws.

  • spaceghoti@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Stop threatening it. Anyone else would already be behind bars right now. Follow through.

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Nobody is above the law. Trump has been fucking around for too long and needs to find out his actions have consequences.

    • zcd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      This geriatric fuck hasn’t seen a single consequence in his whole life, would be nice to see literally anything be done

    • be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Nobody is above the law.

      Patently false. Anyone else behaving as Trump has and indicted on the array of charges he is would be waiting for trial from a jail cell.

      Whatever happens to him now, it will be far less than would have happened to you or I had we committed the same crimes.

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Your average citizen would go straight to jail. Trump is just threatened.

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you’re ever unsure whether there are separate judicial systems for the aristocrats and the poors, try threatening a judge while not rich and see how many warnings you get.

  • Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    The headline is incorrect. The corrected version should read: “Judge in NY fraud trial threatens to jail Trump for violating gag order, ends up doing nothing.”

    These people need to shit or get off the pot already. This really is a legalese version of “I’m going to count to three…”

  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    So the argument is they did take it down from Truth Social, but it remained on the campaign website? I mean, I GUESS that’s plausible deniability… but still feels intentional.