I’m not in love with YouTube, and it only lets me upload a small number a day. Is there a good alternative?

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which is really bad value. Don’t do that unless you need the accessibility of Google drive.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Which is really bad value

        What is a good value alternative? With the accessibility and usability of Google Drive, it feels like quite good value to me. But maybe I don’t know of the possible alternatives.

        • Atemu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I meant value purely as in $/TB without factoring in all the other properties.

          You can get object storage for $6-$7/TB/month from the likes of Wasabi and Backblaze.

          For a more “fair” comparison, you can get Onedrive for $6/TB (+M$'s office suite) or 2TB for $10 at Dropbox, so $5/TB.

          Though I guess Google does have a little more cost effective plan for $10/2TB aswell that I didn’t know about.

          For reference: Google’s 100G and 200G plans are $20/TB and $15/TB respectively. I’d call a 3-4x higher price “really bad value”.

          • *Tagger*@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            For me, the big differentiator is Google photos, I find it very effective and easy to use. I will take the price hit for that convenience.