• milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    I sometimes wonder about this. I hugely value my private communication, and I grew up in a world with that ideal. But with the rise of more cleverly invasive apps and tracking, and ease of someone else putting a video of you online, and so on, I sometimes think about a world where non face-to-face communication isn’t private any more.

    I don’t know what I think of that world.

    After all, we haven’t always had private, at-a-distance communication, especially for all people

    • Kajika@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      We always had. Many people wrote personal notes/letters in cryptic ways to prevent unwanted readers from deciphering it.

      Imagine a word where we would teach children not to make their own cypher because this is illegal. What a distopian society.

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kind of, but written communication for everyone hasn’t even always been a thing. And cryptic letters perhaps aren’t reliable secrecy for ordinary people against trained spying. And anonymity… not without other layers to your communication. And all of that not for your ordinary postcard home: it’s something you do in special situations.

        I don’t think the new law would outlaw encrypting messages to your friend with PGP; nor having a second phone that you leave at the library for anonymity.

    • online@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Tangential, but Lemmy is filled with smart people so I’m going to ask: is it possible to legally make it impossible for wireless signals to work within your own home? That is, how would one dampen access to wireless networks? Would this require illegal use of signal jamming devices as I imagine a Faraday cage would be too difficult to make in a room.

      Edit: where else on Lemmy could I ask this sort of question?

      • nednobbins@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The FCC has a lot of regulations on it. From what I remember active jamming within the home is still wildly illegal. Depending on the size of your house/room, a far as at cage wouldn’t be too difficult, especially if you did it during construction. If you’re on a budget and don’t mind looking crazy you can line a closet with tinfoil and connect it to ground.

      • AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah shielding. Totally passive.

        mobsters did that in their houses, people who buy them often only learn about the previous owner after realizing that one or two rooms are faraday cages - zero wifi or cellular.