• comrade-bear@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, just to see I understood correctly, in your analysis the book is moslty solid with maybe an overzealous defense of Stalin in a few points, and the text I found does bring up said overzealousness but it engages in some pointless hair splitting that sounds a lot like angry padding, is it?