What do y’all think of this? Seems pretty terrible on its face

    • poVoq@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Did you even read the original article? None of that is relevant and comparing it is ridiculous.

      This is very explicitly about North Korea (and others) running their ransomware operations at a profit through tornado cash. Of course this isn’t going to fund their nuclear program, but it is still really shit and criminal and effects real people. And the guy you made tornado cash enabled that, and likely (indirectly) profited from it as well. That is not a poor innocent person that can play the victim card here.

      • liwott@nerdica.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        @poVoq

        This is very explicitly about North Korea (and others) running their ransomware operations at a profit through tornado cash.

        I fail to understand how different that is from the examples cited by @SineNomineAnonymous . They are charged with "hav[ing] failed to address their use as illegal money laundering services. ". Did @torproject manage to address their use as a child porn sharing service?

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          There is a significant difference between enabling cash flows and enabling the exchange of jpgs (only). If Tor had a payment service included that was developed for and used 99% to enable paying for CP, it would be also justified to charge the developers of that payment gateway for aiding in the creation of CP.