• Hugohase@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    And hydrogen, and batteries, and overbuilding, and geographic distribution and a lot more but nukeheads gonna nukehead.

    • Clarke @lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do not think you comprehend how much power would need to be stored. We are steadily electrifying every single industry year after year we use more and more electricity to power that demand we are burning more fossil fuels than ever before while in conjunction utilizing more renewables than ever before well maintaining the same average nuclear load for the last 20 years…

      • Hugohase@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Renewables and storage is what is gonna happen, you can argue against that as much as you want. Growth of renewables is exponential, growth of nuclear is nonexistent.

        • Clarke @lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I swear to God you’re going to kill me with an aneurysm. It’s only non-existent because of dumbasses like you.

          • Hugohase@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Its nonexistent because its expensive and impractical. Every cent spent for nuclear is a wasted cent because you would get twice the power from renewables. LCOE.