• empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 year ago

    The lights would be OK if they simply made them diffuse, low-intensity bulbs like they used to be in the 90’s. Bonus points for being behind a transparent textured plastic lens.

    But no, they simply put open holes in casings that expose the most powerful SMD LED chip they could source.

    • insaneduck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is the most powerful until you specifically want to buy led torch light then they put the cheapest possible light in it.

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course. The bright one all got bought up by Philips so you get a red LED when your smart light bulb is off or some shit.

    • StThicket@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem isn’t the LED itself. The problem is engineers that read the datasheets where it shows which forward current they need. What they forget to think about is that the recommended forward current is for max brightness, so they slap whichever resistor they need, and never give it another thought.

      Whenever I design a LED circuit that is only used as an indicator, I always make it 10% or less than recommended, because I do not need to burn away my retina when I test the boards.

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course that’s smart design. You’d think that would be something that becomes immediately obvious when the very first prototype PCB is put out and none of the engineers can look at the damn thing directly…