Drew Barrymore and Bill Maher are now not resuming their shows amid strikes.

  • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you have any specific examples? I assume you must, since according to you, most of the cases are fucking terrible.

    • LucasWaffyWaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well there were the Dixie Chicks getting canceled by conservatives for opposing the war. Probably not an example the fella you’re replying to wants to admit to, tho.

      • MisterScruffy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could call it cancel culture or your could just call it pissing off your fanbase. This has always existed and will always exist. I don’t agree with the old dixie chicks fanbase but if they thought they could be antiwar and keep playing on country radio they were very misled.

      • Syrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the assumption, saying that getting people to support a strike is a good thing is something most right-wing people do I guess.

        Wanna add Sinead O’Connor to people harmed by right-wing cancel culture, for example? The list doesn’t even stop there.

    • Syrc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Jenna Marbles? Kentaro Kobayashi? Pretty much anyone who got “cancelled” for stuff they said or did 10 years before?

      People should be held accountable for what they’re currently doing, ruining a career for something that happened ages ago which no one at the time found wrong is just stupid.

      • stewie3128@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like you’re complaining about the free market. People don’t like something that was unearthed about someone, so they don’t support them.

        • Syrc@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not a matter of “not supporting”. Marbles was harassed into closing her channel and Kobayashi lost probably the most important job of his life. Those have nothing to do with the “free market”.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who are these people? They sound like virtual nobodies. I doubt they were ‘cancelled’ by anyone. They probably said something very stupid and got kicked off some social media app or other. Or, worse, *gasp* demonetized! Better get selling more Soylent.

            • Syrc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              “I don’t know them so they must be nobodies”, ok.

              Did you even look them up for a second? I can remotely imagine you think that about Jenna Marbles (and I don’t think a “virtual nobody” can get a wax statue at Madame Tussauds honestly), but Kobayashi was supposed to be the Director of the Tokyo Olympics Opening Ceremony. So not really a nobody either, much less virtual since he barely did anything online.

              Did you just google the first name and skimmed through the results page without even opening them?

      • uncouthterran@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “Cancel culture” is a bit of a loaded term and so the replies to you have been somewhat charged. Most people view the situations public figures find them in as just the necessary consequences of their actions. And like you, I agree that each situation should warrant a measured response from individuals based on the severity of the issue. It’s okay to not want to support people you don’t agree with, especially when the reason is agregious or harmful to others. The issue then is that everyone uses the same cudgel in the same manner for every crime regardless of severity.

        But sure, if you don’t want to support someone for even the smallest of infractions, that’s your right. No one can take that from you. I may not agree but I support your right to do so. My only wish is that we at least give pause to think about the high bar for acceptable behavior we’re putting on public figures. I am as much for accountability as the next person, but I also think we’re humans capable of mistakes and capable of change. And right now, I don’t think a culture of grace is necessarily present online. We don’t have to tolerate hate or harm, but we can leave room for redemption. Maybe I’m being naive, I don’t know. But that’s my take.