There was previously discussion about Russell Brand denying allegations that were to be shown in a TV documentary, and now things are developing.

  • lath@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, on another site i saw a gif/video of Brand defending himself. To sum up, he said he has been very open about his past promiscuity many times in the past, all encounters were consensual, has witnesses contradicting the accusations, it’s a very directed agenda by specific media towards discrediting him and to stay tuned for how it turns out.

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well yeah, is it not what an innocent person would also say?

        In a democracy, the premise of “innocent until proven guilty” is quite important and I’m wary of a trial by social media.

        If he’s found guilty then he’ll get whatever is coming to him, but I’m not going to cast aspersions until that time.

        • Lazylazycat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really, one of the women went to a rape crisis centre right after he assaulted her and the investigators were able to verify this, as well as text messages between her and Brand where he apologised for raping her. The MET are asking for other victims to come forward so I think it’s unlikely the end.

    • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh he denied the accusations? Well that changes everything! Yes, it must be the mean ol’ mainstream medias fault then! Please.

      • lath@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why not though? Media have been proven to create false stories before, so it’s not like they wouldn’t.

          • lath@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Masterson already had a trial and was proven guilty. Has that happened in Brand’s case as well? If not, then please avoid treating it as such, for you would be incorrect.

            • Illuminostro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I apologize if I gave you the impression I give a fuck about Brand, or your opinion on the matter. We’re done here.

                  • lath@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    About Brand, i don’t really care in particular. It’s the mob lynching i’m wary of. Branding people as guilty before it is an established fact seems to be a gulty pleasure, pun intended, of even lemmy users. I’d like for people to stop doing that before it becomes the normal thing to do.

                    About this conversation, i only care because communication is the foundation of civilization. We have many languages, so it’s a pretty big part of who we are, even though some of us have come to dread talking to one another.

                    I have no ill meanings in this whole thing, only that we should try to be better for our own state of wellbeing.