• hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean if that is how they feel. Might as well be consistent. /me shrugs

      • Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is an extremely Republican train of thought, are you sure you’re on the right side of the table here?

        • hddsx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          What does political affiliation have to do with anything here?

          In a global utilitarianism point of view, the best course of action is not to pursue that.

          I’m a kantian point of view, there are no exceptions to rules. If you find an exception, it’s a bad rule and needs to be rewritten.

          I’m taking a kantian ethics point of view. Why does this appear to be Republican to you?

    • n2burns@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you’re suggesting ruining someone’s life because you’re pissy about political theatrics they are a criminal?

      FTFY.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The party of personal responsibilitylaw and order … fuck you, I got mine.

    • toasteecup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not saying to do it. I’m simply pointing out that it’s an option and not an amazing one at that.