A new law in Texas requires convicted drunk drivers to pay child support if they kill a child’s parent or guardian, according to House Bill 393.

The law, which went into effect Friday, says those convicted of intoxication manslaughter must pay restitution. The offender will be expected to make those payments until the child is 18 or until the child graduates from high school, “whichever is later,” the legislation says.

Intoxication manslaughter is defined by state law as a person operating “a motor vehicle in a public place, operates an aircraft, a watercraft, or an amusement ride, or assembles a mobile amusement ride; and is intoxicated and by reason of that intoxication causes the death of another by accident or mistake.”

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    So now drunk drivers have an incentive to claim it was intentional, not accidental.

    The overall idea here is excellent, but it is fundamentally nonsensical to only apply it to drunk drivers and not all killers.

    • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess… but that’s a risky move in a state that’s pretty gung-ho with the death penalty. I think most would rather pay the child support than admit to second or first degree murder

    • 11181514@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      You think first degree murder would be a better financial decision than manslaughter?

      Agreed with your second sentence. Though I think the state should step in to help the kids in either instance. If they’re convicted and are in prison it’s trying to get blood from a stone at that point.

      This is Texas though. This isn’t about helping anyone it’s just grandstanding for votes.

      • Default_Defect@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For some people, prison could be a better alternative to becoming homeless due to an even smaller paycheck. I don’t think the idea of it is as outlandish as you think.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I want to know is if they have to keep paying if the kids never graduate. It’s Texas so it seems like the odds are pretty high you could be paying for some dudes kids until they either get shot in a bar or do a lethal fentanyl hit.