• ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    While a pan Atlantic railroad would be interesting, I think it would run into unique problems better solved with other technologies.

    No, I meant planes or other flying vehicles that do not use fuel which is refined from oil.

    • taladar@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know technically there are a few little islands on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean that you could count as European but I am assuming the main focus of European flights would be flights within Europe.

        • tal@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Iceland and the Faroe Islands are normally grouped with Europe, and Greenland with North America.

          • ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly! While Greenland and Iceland are geographically considered American (or half Amarican, half European for Iceland) , they are geopolitically considered European countries.

            This means that a European rail, connecting all European countries, would need a rail to Greenland, which is on the other side of the Atlant.

            Now, I’m not arguing against trains, they are a useful tool for the right job, but planes fill a different role (small load but high speed transport to hard-to-reach locations) that trains cannot fulfill in the same capacity. So instead of abolishing planes, we should try to force them to be more environmentally viable.

            Thank you.