The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

      • damndotcommie@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        76
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, you have completely changed my mind here. I am uploading all my work to github and all my pics as we speak for everyone to use as they please. Give me a break. Are you really that childish in person, or is it just the screen and keyboard giving you this false machismo?

        • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          57
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m not being childish, you’re being ridiculous. This is a library, this is a concept that already exists. You’re thinking too profit oriented, not everything has to be for profit. This is so that people have access to these things now and for generations to come. Copyright laws compromising the internet archive will mean loss of data over the next few generations. There is already so much lost media from the internet era, and so little is being done about it, aside from the awesome efforts of the internet archive.

          This isn’t about profits this is about preserving data from our era.

          There’s more to this argument but it’s already been said in this thread and I don’t feel like throwing it out, and I doubt you’d hear.me out anyway.

        • Tocano@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          you are taking this to the extreme without considering what you are saying. it is true that authors should be rewarded for their efforts to produce a piece of writting or art. however, sometimes some authors and publishers choose to hide this content, which may be useful when accessible by the larger community. imagine if certain inventions were not made public by their inventors. the entire race would still be living in the stone age.

          • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is actually happening with certain things that are patented or prohibitively expensive. I.E. insulin. A LOT of more efficient eco-friendly tech has just not been adopted because it’s patented and it wouldn’t be cost effective for companies to switch in our profit driven capitalist hellscape.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m also a dev. I do upload my work other than my day job work since it’s my employers copyright not mine. You can check out my GitHub which is the same as my username here.

          Regardless though, libraries have existed for decades in the real world - but suddenly in a digital form it’s some unimaginable and unforgivable thing? Give me a break.

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You might not familiar with how the internet archive does the book lending. The book is actually drm-protected and can only be opened with adobe software, which will expire in just a few days, rendering the file useless. What the internet archive did was simply allowing more people to borrow the same book during pandemic instead of only allowing one person at a time. The lent books still expire after a few days. It’s not like the internet archive was suddenly turn into LibGen and distributing unlocked pdf to anyone. Anyone who familiar with LibGen would not bother borrowing from the internet archive digital library. The issue is simply blown up out of proportion by publishers.