But AI has no actual intelligence of it’s own. It’s not going to magically just figure things out. All it can do is spit back what it has been fed.
But AI has no actual intelligence of it’s own. It’s not going to magically just figure things out. All it can do is spit back what it has been fed.
If everyone did that, we wouldn’t need these laws. But alas, the general public doesn’t seem to give enough fucks about their own privacy to change things on their own.
Edit: Guess it isn’t a law, but their policy. Same principle applies.
Ahhh, right, because only republicans execute people… Way to make this political.
And yet cars kill a lot more people than guns.
Would your comment be as sarcastic if you replaced cars with guns? Doubt it.
🤦
And why do you think this needs to be a Republican vs Democrat thing?? Interjecting politics into everything isn’t a good look. I really don’t even see where that came from because I have friends that are Democrats and that’s what they watched the Superbowl this year to see. I also have Republican friends who also watched the Superbowl to see shots of her. All of them are Taylor Swift fans, and not football fans. So you have to bring up political views for what reason? I get it, politics are polarizing, but it gets quite tiresome when people on both sides of the aisle feel the need to make everything divisive. We have two teams playing a football game, isn’t that enough competition and division for one day?
Idiocracy has my vote.
with absolutely no hiccups
So are you ignoring Apollo 13? How about Apollo 1? And what are you on about not being able to broadcast from halfway around the world??? Do you watch evening news, because I see reports from all over the world on a daily basis.
Where did all the replies to this post go? There was an entire discussion that is now gone, and nothing in the modlog.
Or their boss.
Look folks, it’s the Simone Biles of mental gymnastics. You have some serious growing up to do if that’s your argument. Just because it’s potentially fake doesn’t make it any less of an invasion of privacy. So your argument is that everyone shouldn’t give a shit about privacy, especially their own?
Models aren’t good enough yet to actually fully create quality content.
Which is why I really hate the fact that the programmers and the media have dubbed this “intelligence”. Bigger programs and more data doesn’t just automatically make something intelligent.
Yeah, I was downvoted to hell in a copyright thread for suggesting that my work had worth and that I wasn’t just freely handing it over to the general public. Sounds like a bunch of 12 year olds that have never created a fucking thing in their life except for some artistic skidmarks in their underwear. These kids have a lot to learn about life.
This dipshit is also ignoring that fact that there could be other killings outside of muslim culture that just aren’t branded honor killing. How about Alex Murdaugh? He killed his wife and son. His son was under indictment, accused of driving a boat into a bridge while drunk, killing a passenger. That sure seems like a honor killing to me. But hey, he isn’t muslim, so we won’t call it that.
And from your link “Honour killings are believed to have originated from tribal customs.” But go ahead with your muslim diatribe.
And you have no way of indicating whether or not someone who had killed a child has deemed it in their mind as an honor killing. The point is, you have a lot to learn. Thinking this can just be solved by eliminating religion, well that’s a tall order. Preach on though, and show those wacky muslims how they should act.
But the numbers don’t lie. It is an almost uniquely Muslim phenomenon.
What?? You think muslim people have the lock on killing their own children. I think I just saw a news story weeks ago about a woman in the u.s. that killed her children. I mean americans usually tend towards just killing a bunch of other people’s kids, but whatever. Keep thinking religion is the bad guy here.
Hmmm. Maybe you could start traveling the world preaching your belief. Maybe call yourself a missionary.
Way to sweepingly generalize something. I had to use copyright laws when I was a pro track photographer. I found out that one of the drivers owned a printing shop. He was telling people to purchase one photo from me at my price and then turning around, scanning it in, and re-printing them for the customers at a lower price. Same exact work, so you can’t argue about the quality. This fuck was also taking my images and using them in advertising which was also a copyright violation. This isn’t about who took the better picture as I was the person behind the camera. It’s about protecting work, that in my case involved time and actual sweat each and every weekend I was out in the sun. But it seems the majority of people in this thread think that he was justified in stealing MY work.
So exactly how would non-capitalism work here? I am curious to see what kind of games we would have if there were no incentives.