Carlos Santana, Alice Cooper, Róisín Murphy, Dave Chappelle, J.K. Rowling, Harry Jowsey, Bette Midler, Macy Gray, Kevin Hart, John Cleese

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a little bit of sympathy for people who are from another era, and are stubborn but not intentionally hateful or dismissive. The Bette Midler quote is the only example from this article. Before, she’d never come across as someone who judges people or wants to treat them like second class citizens.

    She should have kept her mouth shut, at least. Although making an uninformed remark is quicker and easier than educating yourself, I wish she had taken the time.

    Santana, however, can kiss my ass.

    • gk99@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a little bit of sympathy for people who are from another era

      I don’t. Trans people are a new thing for me too, they didn’t “exist” in my formative years. I grew up in Oklahoma surrounded by conservative Bible-belt redneck N-word-spouting family, at a public school where “gay” and “hermaphrodite” were used as gym insults. I’m a straight-passing white cis male with pretty blue eyes, the least oppressed motherfucker out here and a perfect candidate for growing up to be a shitty supremacist.

      Yet I’m the farthest thing from one, because all it actually takes is asking myself “Why should I have a problem with this? Does it affect anyone other than the person being made happier?” When the answer comes up as “no,” it’s A-OK in my book. And don’t get me started on the pricks who think “but I’m Christian!!!” is an excuse for anything, God is supposed to judge us, not my asshole neighbor Karen who grew up on leaded gas and cigarettes.

      • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cool. Maintaining flexibility is hard. I wish more people were better at it.

        Part of my “cut them a bit of slack” attitude comes from personal experience. I’ve been watching an otherwise good person shift gradually further right. Since retirement, they watch TV almost constantly, which unfortunately includes Fox News (I was going to say “too much Fox News”, but any amount of that crap is too much).

    • gowan@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Midler came up playing the NYC bathhouses which were essentially fuck clubs for gay men before AIDS shuttered them all. I have a difficult time seeing her being anti-LGBT given how gay her fan base traditionally was.

      • Chetzemoka@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I’m sure she’s still very pro-LGB. Most TERFs are (for now at least). It’s the T part of the equation that they think it’s acceptable to hate

        • gk99@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          TERFs may be the dumbest people alive. How are you going to be all about equality and acceptance after literally thousands of years of women being mistreated, only to turn around and do that to a different group and see no problem with it? Absolutely mindless.

          • elfpie@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            But they are not equivalent. People that erase trans people read it like that and project. In a medical setting, the biology is important and the language makes sure all parts involved are included in the conversation.

            • gowan@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              This begs the question why is it acceptable to assign terms to people they do not identify as? Your comment would make sense in medical discussions about people giving birth but that’s not how it is being used.

              • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                It does not beg that question because that is literally how it is being used. Your continued hammering of that point is simply untrue and feels incredibly disingenuous since multiple people have told you that is how it is being used

                • gowan@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It is being used to describe someone in a way they would prefer not to be used for them. Is this really that hard to see the overt hypocrisy in?

                  • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    There’s a distinct difference between complaining that you were labeled a certain way and being a celebrity and writing a rant apropos of nothing on Twitter about how an amorphous “they” are not calling us women anymore.

                    You’re right that no one should be referred to in a way they don’t want to be, but that only applies when they’re not being intolerant. Punch Nazis and call them assholes and Nazis. It’s good and cool.

        • gowan@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Her comment sounds like she isn’t anti trans but more has a problem with terms like birthing person instead of cis-woman or woman depending on context.

          It’s not anti-trans to suggest we use the term women rather than birthing person when discussing pregnancy fir example.

          • Adramis [he/him]@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Except that it is, because it erases entire swaths of people who are able to give birth but who aren’t women. Birthing person is inclusive of women and everyone else. I don’t understand the problem.

            • Leshoyadut@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              It also doesn’t refer to cis women who are unable to give birth for any variety of reasons. It’s specifically not referring to a pretty sizable group of cis women while also including people who aren’t cis women, because cis women aren’t the ones being referred to; birthing people are.

            • gowan@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why is it ok to force a descriptor on a group of people that do not identify with said term?

              • Vodulas [they/them]@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because it is meant to be used in healthcare care settings in reference to groups of people. It is a way more accurate and complete description of the cohort. Nobody is going around calling individual women “birthing people.” Midler took a term out of context and tried to claim people are trying to erase women, which is classic TERF behavior