• iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wish it didn’t but historically and logically speaking, there’s no other way. The unethical stone cold people rise to the top, and the few who are powerful yet maintain their morals are not nearly powerful enough to fight the rest. Critical change has always come about with revolutions, either violent or technological. And I don’t think technology can improve anything for us at this point, if anything it will make things harder.

    • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yea, I sure as hell would rather find balance at the hands of peace but has that ever happened? Has a collective known to hoard resources ever in history amicably decided to give back what they took? Nothing I’ve ever read* indicates yes. Once your rent goes up it’s never going back down. Humans are, imho, innately evil - as in the tendency to cause harm to others for personal gain and fulfillment is a basic human/animal* drive. The hoarding population ain’t giving shit back. We’re gonna have to take it back. Shoulda never been so fucking gullible to begin with.

      • iByteABit [he/him]@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The sad part is that it wasn’t always like this. Hunter gatherer communities cared for their pack (with a few exceptions, like sick and disabled members that can’t keep up) because if the pack survives then they will survive as well. But with the advent of agriculture, individualism popped up more and more, the good of all no longer meant as much.