• taladar@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You could always tax by emissions and weight. EVs are not really the solution to the general car problem anyway. Mass transit is, at least in cities and other densely populated areas.

    • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think we agree but I still need to point out: Individual transport will always be a requirement for living in rural areas. The “fuck cars” sentiment only makes sense in cities with more than ~3 million inhabitants.

      • Arbic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree with the sentiment on cars in the city, I’d say that it is already viable in much smaller cities. I live in a city with 350k inhabitants and I’m doing quite well without a car.

        • tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          For sure. But forbidding cars doesn’t make sense until you have several millions of people in a single city.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are you smoking lmao, do you seriously think anything below 3 million people is rural?

        rural is when it takes you an hour to reach the nearest grocery store by car.

        • andrai@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not rural, that’s ultra remote wilderness. Like what place doesn’t have a grocery store in a 100km radius? Some place deep in the Australian outback?

            • andrai@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My definition of rural is a place with some semblance of human habitation that is not urban. A speck of land characterized by villages, farms or forestry. Where you have limited access to the amenities found in cities.

              However, what village does not have a grocery store? Or at least not one in the next bigger village?

              Do you have some examples of villages without a grocery store an hour of driving away?

          • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Village of ~10k, nearest grocery store is 25min walk, 10min bike, 5min car.

            There are also three smaller stores a 2 min walk away. Europe for reference

            • andrai@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I sincerely doubt there is a a place in Europe outside of maybe remote Scandinavia or Russia where you can’t get to a grocery store after driving for an hour.