• sugarcake@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago
    • it has to be passed in a democratically elected parlament. It may not get passed.
    • it is an extension of an existing law that forbid burning of flags (except the Danish flag Dannebrog)
    • book burnings are for morons
    • fuck you
      • sugarcake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I am proud to say that it is. Burning the danish flag is barely a provocation. The law is intended to stop individuals from provoking or threatening foreign nations, who may feel differently.

          • tal@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_desecration

            It looks like most countries in mainland Europe either restrict flag desecration in general or desecration of their national flag.

            Of the mainland Europe countries for which data exists, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, and Romania permit it, and Denmark prohibits desecration of international flags but permits desecration of the national flag.

            It looks like the British tradition is to permit it – the UK, Ireland, Australia, the US, and Canada permit it (though New Zealand does not).

            It looks like most countries around the world prohibit desecration of their own flag but permit desecration of those of others.

            The only other countries that take the Danish approach (permit desecration of own but not of others) are Uruguay and Japan.

            It looks like Europe is actually one of the most-restrictive places in the world in terms of flag desecration. Few countries around the world restrict both desecration of one’s own flag and the flag of other countries; almost all are in Europe, with only Israel and South Korea doing the same outside of Europe.

    • CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 year ago
      • fuck you
      • fuck you
      • fuck you
      • fuck you
      • burning the fucking Quoran is the right way to dispose of it according to itself
      • a democratically elected government can do undemocratic things (and they often do)
      • the existing law is idiotic
      • sugarcake@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        burning the fucking Quoran is the right way to dispose of it according to itself

        Please link to the verse of the Quran you refer to. I don’t believe you.

        Why is the existing law idiotic? What problems do you have with it?