Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.eeimagemessage-square1720fedilinkarrow-up11.17Karrow-down1283
arrow-up1886arrow-down1imageLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.eeKidplayer_666@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square1720fedilink
minus-squareJoe@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThanks for the links. I’ve been reading. It is not far off my understanding. It’s novel to me that anyone claims that the famine itself was deliberate. I’ve never heard anyone claiming that before. Anyway, I noticed that https://lb.ua/news/2010/01/14/19793_nalivaychenko_nazval_kolichestvo_zh.html says 10 million, while https://hexbear.net/post/20004 links to it and claims it says 4 million. I guess the wayback machine should be checked. My day was long, I’m tired, and there is more to read. I’ll have to re-read your previous comments to find the Q that interests you.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI appreciate you taking the time to look into the material I’ve provided you. Anyway, I noticed that https://lb.ua/news/2010/01/14/19793_nalivaychenko_nazval_kolichestvo_zh.html says 10 million, while https://hexbear.net/post/20004 links to it and claims it says 4 million. I guess the wayback machine should be checked. That’s odd. Good catch!
Thanks for the links. I’ve been reading. It is not far off my understanding. It’s novel to me that anyone claims that the famine itself was deliberate. I’ve never heard anyone claiming that before.
Anyway, I noticed that https://lb.ua/news/2010/01/14/19793_nalivaychenko_nazval_kolichestvo_zh.html says 10 million, while https://hexbear.net/post/20004 links to it and claims it says 4 million. I guess the wayback machine should be checked.
My day was long, I’m tired, and there is more to read. I’ll have to re-read your previous comments to find the Q that interests you.
I appreciate you taking the time to look into the material I’ve provided you.
That’s odd. Good catch!