Clone_IX@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago4k is not 2160p - heard it here first!www.dexerto.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up138arrow-down13file-text
arrow-up135arrow-down1external-link4k is not 2160p - heard it here first!www.dexerto.comClone_IX@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square19fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKalash@feddit.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year ago Same goes for calling it 4K or UHD, even when one is technically incorrect. Why is it incorrect? 4k isn’t a formal standard. It just means you have approximatly 4k horizontal pixels.
minus-squareDomi@lemmy.secnd.melinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThe logic of some people goes that anything under 4000 horizontal pixels is not “real” 4k. But as mentioned, I don’t care and also call 3840x2160 “4k” simply because it’s shorter than “2160p”.
Why is it incorrect? 4k isn’t a formal standard. It just means you have approximatly 4k horizontal pixels.
The logic of some people goes that anything under 4000 horizontal pixels is not “real” 4k. But as mentioned, I don’t care and also call 3840x2160 “4k” simply because it’s shorter than “2160p”.