• rookeh@geddit.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    81
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like whatever point Steve is trying to make here could have been a community post or even a short rather than what looks like a 45 minute hit piece on his competitor.

    This appears (from the thumbnail and first few minutes of content) to be drama for the sake of drama. If anyone can summarise to the contrary, please do.

      • rookeh@geddit.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I just finished watching it. I stand corrected - first impressions aside, Steve raises some important concerns.

        I’m also impressed that he voluntarily de-monetized his own video, it goes a long way to highlighting the principles behind it. Not many content creators literally put their money where their mouth is like that.

        I will be interested to see how LMG responds to this.

          • cybersandwich@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s literally what Linus does in his post though.

            I feel like LTT has earned so much more goodwill than people are giving them right now. Linus particularly seems like an incredibly honest guy.

            The tenor of this entire thread is weird to me. LTT is great, and this won’t get me to stop watching them or subscribing.

          • rookeh@geddit.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            From his response:

            To Steve, I expressed my disappointment that he didn’t go through proper journalistic practices in creating this piece

            I’d be interested to hear what Linus considers to be proper journalistic practice in that case.

            The rest of his response goes some way to addressing a few of the concerns raised, but I feel this is going to turn into another “Trust me Bro” debacle (i.e. he cannot seem to take criticism on the chin, no matter how valid or invalid it may be).

            • legion02@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              I get it a tiny bit. Normal journalist practice would be to reach out for comment on a piece like this. Doesn’t and wouldn’t change the accuracy of the content though.

            • ddkman@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay asking LTT-s CEO (not him btw) would’ve helped, on the other hand nothing he wrote in the comments about “”“”“commiting payment”“”“”“” to Billit made the case look any better.

    • Clav64@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      could have been a community post or even a short

      That’s been the problem, corrects get relegated to a useless stub rather than a genuine effort to set the record.

    • riesendulli@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      He is showing in video statements and fails done by LTT. There is nothing to water down to people like you. It’s either full data or you will misrepresent what was stated

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Communit, post? Sorry but that would be a wall of text.
      Short? Dude theres only 60 seconds. Even a good TLDR of a 44min script can et best be shortened to 15-20min