• 31 Posts
  • 672 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2023

help-circle


  • Note: this comment is long, because it is important and the idea that “systemd is always better, no matter the situation” is absolutely dangerous for the entire FOSS ecosystem: both diversity and rationality are essential.

    Systemd can get more efficient than running hundreds of poorly integrated scripts

    In theory yes. In practice, systemd is a huge monolithic single-point-of-failure system, with several bottlenecks and reinventing-the-wheel galore. And openrc is a far cry from “hundreds of poorly integrated scripts”.

    I think it is crucial we stop having dogmatic “arguments” with argumentum ad populum or arguments of authority, or we will end up recreating a Microsoft-like environment in free software.

    Let’s stop trying to shoehorn popular solutions into ill suited use cases, just because they are used elsewhere with different limitations.

    Systemd might make sense for most people on desktop targets (CPUs with several cores, and several GB of RAM), because convenience and comfort (which systemd excels at, let’s be honest) but as we approach “embedded” targets, simpler and smaller is always better.

    And no matter how much optimisation you cram into the bigger software, it will just not perform like the simpler software, especially with limited resources.

    Now, I take OpenRC as an example here, because it is AFAIR the default in devuan, but it also supports runit, sinit, s6 and shepherd.

    And using s6, you just can’t say “systemd is flat out better in all cases”, that would be simply stupid.



  • 7heo@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.mlJunior Dev VS Senior Dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Junior dev:

    Straight out of uni, know the latest developments while having also studied long established standards and specifications (like POSIX, LSB, SQL, etc), full of energy, and ready to speedrun burning out any %

    Senior dev:

    Hasn’t learned anything substantial in decades, uses outdated specs because “who got the time for that, and legacy stuff works just as well anyway”, copy pastes most of their work from stack overflow, is only still employed because of their inside information knowledge and the utter absence of documentation leading to a bus factor of one, and has perfected the art of gaming the system to the point of photoshopping a sloppy IDE screen over their WoW game whenever a picture of them “working” gets taken.

    Yeah, checks out.



  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hey, for what it’s worth, I appreciate your efforts to remain nice with an insufferable old man yelling at clouds. Thanks 🙏

    And I’m not arguing for the sake of arguing, this stuff is actually being read by more people than we know. Correctness matters. Even if that makes me beyond annoying to you.

    I hope you have a great day and I wish you all the best. 🙂


  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You’ll get a lot farther with people being kinder in their corrections of your incorrect presumptions if you vibe check yourself and cool it with the providing the enlightened eurobrain takes.

    I don’t know that my “presumptions” were incorrect. And I don’t care much for kindness when we’re talking about a system that takes from the poor to give to the rich.

    I know the north american tipping system is a top-down broken trash fire. You’ll find that I never actually endorsed the system, just commented on the reality of it. It’s possible for someone to acknowledge how something works (“how it works” =/= an endorsement of functionality) while understanding that the system itself is negatively impactful to those inside it

    Oh, and I’m pretty sure a vast majority of the upvotes you got on your comment are from people who actually think it does work.

    Because, yes, “how it works” is an endorsement. I would never say “how burning coal to reduce CO2 emissions works”. It doesn’t.

    “How it is supposed to work”, or “how it is designed”, aren’t necessarily endorsements, but, yeah, again, nobody said that, and people really think it works: they think they are getting lower prices as customers, which they aren’t, and that somehow, deciding themselves how much the service worker should take home is both a good idea and something that lets said worker have a fulfilling life, which it absolutely isn’t.


    Now, essentially, to break things down a little and reduce the amount of goalpost moving:

    user “Zron” wrote that I didn’t understand “how tipping works”, which in actuality meant “how handling the cards happen over here”, which is an entirely different thing.

    Any monkey can tell “how tipping works”, that’s why the system is currently used. You take a price, multiply it by 1 + (tip/100) and you pay that. The seller gets more money than they were supposed to. And that is the way it works on the entire planet.

    So the discussion at hand is about two separate topics:

    1. How means of payment get mismanaged.
    2. The “custom” of paying someone slavery wages, and expecting them to coerce random people into giving them enough money not to die.

    So I’ll answer in two parts:

    I - Mismanagement of means of payments

    This reflects a different view on trust. In Europe, different countries have very different customs about trust management and means of payments. For example, while, in Germany, you legally have to go to the police station within weeks of moving in a new place, to declare your new address, and have your German ID card show your current address always; in France, people have random addresses on their ID (where they were born, or where they lived years ago), and no one knows where anyone lives. As a consequence of that, in Germany, you only have to show your ID, but in France, you need to show recent invoices tied to your address (from the electricity or gas company, for example). Anyway, I digress.

    I’m not an American, so someone else is free to correct me, but most of the US is still being introduced to chip cards. I believe there’s still places where it’s not exactly uncommon for the server to swipe for you.

    Yeah so that is somewhat news to me. I’m aware of the “waiter swiping your card for you, it getting declined, and the waiter cutting your card in two” trope. I never realised that chips on cards were a European thing.

    My point here is: your money, your means of payments. If you give those to someone else, then, practically, for all intents and purposes, it is their money.

    They could overcharge you. They could copy your card’s information and buy stuff online at a later date. They could sell that information to brokers on the dark net. Why would one do that?? Why???!

    II - Paying people slavery wages

    if you can’t afford having employees, then don’t.

    Yes… I agree. I never actually endorsed the north american system though?

    I believe you didn’t intend to. I also believe a lot of those who upvoted you totally think you did.

    When you write things like:

    why would you start talking authoritatively on the deranged state of North American tipping culture when you dont seem to understand how it works?

    It totally means:

    1. “It works”
    2. You (meaning me) do not understand cross multiplication
    3. You (meaning me) are talking out of your ass

    When all those 3 things are false.

    I was missing information on how bad exactly it was with the mismanagement of people’s means of payment (which I addressed above), and this is the only part that can be construed as me “not understanding” something (even tho, that would be incorrect: “understanding” and “knowing” are vastly different concepts, and not knowing someone is stupid doesn’t mean that you do not understand what stupidity is).

    See, my issue with all this, is: in my view, the only appropriate way to react to that system is to trash it. Anyone being even neutral to it kinda means some level of acceptance to me.

    It is bad. Destroying families bad.


    Oh, and:

    But then, you are legally allowed to literally kill them, right?

    Holy bad faith Batman

    Not “bad faith”. Just a totally unrelated, other American thing that I also hate. Gun violence. I added it as a cheeky joke, I never meant for it to be taken seriously in the present context, but it is still very real. Why is it still a thing, I will never understand. That, you can say, I do not understand.




  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Credit card isn’t a bank account, it’s a line of credit. you can freeze credit and charge it back for fraudulent purchases.

    Tell me you have never lived outside of North America without telling me you have never lived outside of North America.

    I do have a credit card, but I do not have a “line of credit”. In fact, I didn’t fucking know what it was until today. I didn’t even know it existed.

    See, the way it works for me, is: I have money, and the credit card lets me buy something without charging it immediately to my checking account. My balance still displays the sum of the positive amount of my checking account and the negative amount of my credit card. So, for example, let’s say I have 10k on my checking account, and use 2k off of my credit card, my balance will be 8k. It lets me go “in the virtual red” for 2k I think, and only until the day of the month where the money is transferred from my checking account to my credit card account. This allows for a certain flexibility with paying dues on time, even when you haven’t been paid yet. Even if I had 0 on my checking account, I could use my CC for paying various stuff, and THEN get paid for a job, without any fees of any kind. That’s the point. There’s no “score” or “line” or whatever scam designed to make people fail and then charge them insane fees and interests so they can’t get back on their feet, and end up being bled for the rest of their days.

    I guess you never buy anything off the internet then either.

    Wire transfers are instant. And if not that, then there are cryptocurrencies. Slightly slower, but still very usable.

    And no, I do not buy stuff online very often. I pay mostly on invoice.

    And if you do buy off the internet, you should use credit, as it’s much safer to freeze a credit card than your entire bank account if your card gets leaked.

    Yeah so, I don’t wanna use a CC online. Other means of payment are just so much better.

    Also don’t get why you’re being so hostile to a comment that’s simply explaining how a different works. Must be a European thing.

    Because the concept of “tips” in the US isn’t a thing that “works”. And just like with “union busting”, we’re not too found of toxic “customs” being sold as “normal”, and eventually ending up creeping over. Some of the stuff is better in the US, some of the stuff is better in Europe. But for the stuff that is undeniably better in Europe, please don’t try and fuck it up?


  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I don’t know how doing heroin works, but I still know it’s terrible idea.

    Besides, North America doesn’t own the concept of “tipping”. You own the concept of perverting it into abuse, yes, but we do have (relatively sane) tipping over here. Which I do know about. But I guess you wouldn’t know that, buddy, because the world revolves around North America, eh?


  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    how it works

    https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/addressing-the-u-s-homelessness-crisis/

    https://fortune.com/europe/2022/07/12/how-to-end-homelessness-finland-solution-housing-first/

    If I were you, I’d be a tad more cautious with the use of that word, “works”. Seems a lil bit overblown for what you are talking about.

    It’s surprisingly common for cashiers to re-enter your tip amount for you when they reset the machine if there was an issue with your transaction

    If you don’t check the amount before entering the pin, it’s a you problem. If you give away your CC and assume the person has integrity, it’s a you problem. If the person is threatening you, it is a robbery. But then, you are legally allowed to literally kill them, right?

    Unfortunately when people’s incomes rely on tips

    I’ll refer you to the bit above about the word “works”. Not gonna repeat myself. Running a business isn’t simple, but fortunately, not everything is complicated: if you can’t afford having employees, then don’t. If you can’t afford running your business without employees, then don’t. There’s a reason it is called a “business plan” and not a “business guess”.

    As terrible as Capital One is (extremely bad)

    I have found literally one good bank so far. One. Among the 5 countries I lived in.

    this isn’t a dark pattern to keep you from spending money, they get more out of you if you spend more on your Credit card because of the interest on repayments.

    Fair, I’ll admit: this makes sense. I know (not from first hand experience, but there are enough accounts online to make this common knowledge) that the credits in the US are extremely predatory. Worse than that, the entire system is designed to make you fail. So yeah, OK, you are right, point taken, I’ll correct what I wrote on the prior comment.


  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Tell me you don’t know how tips work without telling me.

    Tell me you don’t know how tips are in the US without telling me. FTFY.

    Yeah so I’m from good ol’ Europe, where we tip as a feedback for a stellar service, not as an attempt try and help service workers get food and shelter to survive another week. So yeah, no, I don’t know how “tips work”, because apparently that also implies giving your credit card to another person, letting them go out of your sight with it, and charge you whatever the hell they want. I would also never give my credit card to anyone else. Either you got a means of payment where my CC doesn’t leave my hand, or you will get cash. I’m not handing out my entire bank account to a rando.

    Edit: s/it/my CC/ # for clarity


  • 7heo@lemmy.mlto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonegenerulesity
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m more inclined to think that it’s a dark pattern to shame you into keeping the money in thei…erm your account. You know, where they can use it.

    Because I don’t think there would be much room to complain, after the fact, about a price you already agreed to pay, and paid. But yeah, thanks for your answer. 🙂

    Edit: that was wrong, apparently US banks get more from a customer’s funds when the customer spends more, than they do when said customer has money saved up.



  • It’s convenient to blame the people at large for what’s happening, and of course to some degree we all have a responsibility to do what we can, but it’s also important to look at where the CO2 is coming from, who is making efforts to reduce it, and who is making efforts to prevent any limitations from being crafted.

    Yeah, absolutely, but just like with major tragedies can be traced back to only a few meaningful people (holocaust, Cambodian genocide, Bangladesh genocide, Circassian genocide, Armenian genocide, Greek genocide, Rwandan genocide, Assyrian genocide, Chechen genocide, Hutus genocide, Isaaq genocide, Guatemalan genocide, Libyan genocide, the NKVD “Polish operation”, the great Chinese famine, Soviet famine of the 1930s, …; to only mention some from the past century), the participation of enough people is necessary to enact anything. And the inaction of most of the remainder.

    As the famous unattributed adage says:

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.

    Point is: mass consumption is necessary to enable the abusers to such degree.

    This is obviously something that ties heavily into capitalism, big business, and corrupt governments.

    This ties into enabling any government to mindlessly mass-produce CO2. As it turns out, the current capitalist degeneration we call “the economeh” puts megacorporations in charge, and lets them “trade” their “pollution allowance”. Such practice exacerbate the problem, and are completely insane.

    But unfortunately the mass production of CO2 is not limited to capitalism and western societies. Any human development needs energy, that is how we transform what is around us. Using “fossil fuels” is several orders of magnitude more potent than not. Lemme rephrase that: generating this amount of CO2 is what enables our lifestyle.

    The only viable alternative is using nuclear energy, and the vast majority of the population is terrified of it, so it realistically is not going to happen anytime soon.

    Anyhow, such lifestyle (cars, new clothes twice a year, meat at every other meal, 20C in the house at all times, a constant internet connection on the go, comfort services, etc) is what the overwhelming majority of humans want, and that is the actual problem.

    TL;DR: capitalism, or at least our inbred redneck version of it, makes matters a lot worse. But the problem is with uncontrolled human “development”, and letting people consume mindlessly.

    To put it another way, you can’t recycle your way out of global warming. Systemic problems require systemic solutions.

    You vote with your wallet, and humanity has voted for climate change.

    This isn’t about recycling. Recycling at the scale we are envisioning it is utter gaslighting. It barely works, and when it does, it produces CO2 as well. If we wanted to have an impact, we should only accept products that last several decades, reuse and repair.

    No, the mass-pollution that is causing the 6th extinction event has been entirely, totally, completely, unequivocally, and unreservedly enabled by us.

    Let’s stop hiding behind those “big bad capitalist baddies”. They are absolutely despicable assholes, but we enabled them.

    And by “we” and “us” I mean “those of us, relatively to their buying power”. Which brings me to the point I was making above: the older generations, that accumulated riches, and monopolized ownership, funneled all the money, and decided to invest (the part of this money that they didn’t greedily accumulate or reuse to further their monopoly) into comfort and status consumption, which, in turn, are responsible for enabling the industrial actors to pollute as much.