This is why I always flinch a little when nationalism in revolutionary countries is described as a “good” thing by communists.
Nationalism isn’t “good.” It’s a force that can stand in opposition to imperialism, which is the primary contradiction. In that way, it’s useful. But left unchecked, any nationalism can fester and grow into something dangerous. As you’ve said, Han chauvanism is a real thing in China and hopefully it remains a fringe ideology that dissolves over time.
When I say “good” nationalism, I always mean as in the kind an exploitated socialist or anti-imperialist country has, to stand up against international bourgeoisie. I understand that nationalism is a double-edged sword.
This is why I always flinch a little when nationalism in revolutionary countries is described as a “good” thing by communists.
Nationalism isn’t “good.” It’s a force that can stand in opposition to imperialism, which is the primary contradiction. In that way, it’s useful. But left unchecked, any nationalism can fester and grow into something dangerous. As you’ve said, Han chauvanism is a real thing in China and hopefully it remains a fringe ideology that dissolves over time.
When I say “good” nationalism, I always mean as in the kind an exploitated socialist or anti-imperialist country has, to stand up against international bourgeoisie. I understand that nationalism is a double-edged sword.