@Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world This looks like your source

If someone needs CPR, they’re dead and you’re trying to bring them back to life. They weren’t conscious and won’t remember receiving CPR.

Then there’s the people that can’t have anything thinner than jello. I shuddered the first time I watched someone chew water

Doodle is a great name! He didn’t look very poodley so I thought I’d check

Doodle is the dog’s name or the dog is a cross with a poodle?

Maybe Boozilla is your wife’s parents

I think the “extra” charges are often used to put someone who’s clearly a danger to society away for longer. Another example I can think of that’s similar is someone going to jail for CSAM gets a separate charge for every frame of video, as they’re separate “images”. I agree that the law should be more straightforward but there are instances where nuance can be helpful.

They killed her before stingray Jesus could come back and forgive the sins of all the stingrays. After they killed Steve Irwin, they’ve all been damned to Hell.

According to the article, activists are already using the information to further their research. So, it’s not out of the question that innocent people’s information was released after buying material from this site for research. Doxxing is also not legal in every jurisdiction, which can lead to legal repercussions for the doxxer and the platform that hosts the information. It also encourages retaliation, which potentially puts the community at risk.

A report is just that, a report. I sent a heads up that this post contained doxxed information. If the mod team is not concerned by it, it’s obviously within your power to ignore my report. If you needed more information, it would have been easy to send a PM rather than trying to make some kind of statement by asking publicly.

Did you have a follow up question or was my explanation of what doxxing is sufficient?

I didn’t apologize for anyone

https://letmegooglethat.com/?q=what+is+doxxing