It seems Martha’s mistake wasn’t the Insider trading, it was not running for office before she did it.

I haven’t been able to locate the link again, but the full video shows they’re using a hairdryer to push it.

Yeah, it’s the red 40: https://www.commodious.co.uk/knowledge-bank/food-safety/food-additives

Edit: you’re likely right about the mineral oil too: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1966/1073/body/made?view=plain#:~:text=Prohibition of mineral hydrocarbon in food&text=(b)no person shall sell,food containing any mineral hydrocarbon.

I believe this is the one you’re referring to (screenshot because it won’t let me see the actual post without an account?): https://twitter.com/DmitryOpines/status/1724918411438805153

Link to actual post he was replying to: https://twitter.com/breakingbaht/status/1724892505647296620

Epic already tried and failed with the same argument against Apple, from the article:

Epic in 2021 mostly lost a nearly identical case against Apple over its own app store monopoly for iOS devices, and it is waiting to find out whether the US Supreme Court will hear an appeal.

It’s not about the testing, it’s about the SUV/light truck loophole that’s allowed automakers to build larger vehicles that aren’t counted for CAFE calculations. Here’s one article about it: https://www.distilled.earth/p/the-loophole-that-made-cars-in-america

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jiH97O542jA?t=10s

General Motors