As far as I’m aware, the footprint of ethanol plants is not public information. If you’re unwilling to extend the benefit of the doubt far enough to accept that ethanol production takes less land than livestock production, I can’t help you.
As far as I’m aware, the footprint of ethanol plants is not public information. If you’re unwilling to extend the benefit of the doubt far enough to accept that ethanol production takes less land than livestock production, I can’t help you.
You can make ethanol in a bathtub, so I don’t know what you’re looking for here.
Maybe I do.
I think what’s relevant to habbas, is that she seems to be in a position to achieve fame, without all of the drawbacks of trump’s fame. Her drawbacks include potentially being sued by trump for malpractice (which her professional liability insurance will defend her against) and the attorney’s fees for this case, which probably seems like a good trade.
I do think he enjoys fame, but not at all costs, because he’s clearly not enjoying himself now. Maybe he didn’t realize he didn’t want fame? Maybe he wanted fame only so that he could improve the value of his brand and make more money, but that’s no longer working.
He did, at one point, have quite a lot of money, he could have financed and starred in some movies if he really just wanted to be famous.
That’s a fair point, but I do still get the vibe that he cares more about money than fame. It just seems like he really wanted to run for president, and was disappointed when he won. He seemed to hate the last seven years and now it seems he’s just trying to stay out of jail and not have to pay a whole bunch of money, so he thinks being president again is the only way to do that.
Why on earth did you branch out my comment into three different subsection replies in which you say essentially the same thing?
Cutting livestock subsidies and offering tax incentives and government support for farmers who want to convert their farms from livestock to plant farms, while increasing import tariffs on meat and dairy.
You’re correct, of course, but it’s a minuscule amount of land compared to livestock farming.
Cutting livestock subsidies and offering significant financial support to farmers converting from livestock to plant farming, while increasing tariffs on imported meats.
I don’t think trump’s goal is fame, so no. I do think Kim kardashian is smart for the same reason though. I’m not saying they’re role models, to be clear.
It’s one thing to convert farms from one type of product to another with support, but just decreasing production is simply going to make people hungry.
Do you not see how she’s getting press time for these stunts? I think that’s her goal, so she’s doing pretty well
I still don’t think she’s dumb. I think she’s trying to get and stay famous and she’s doing a pretty good job so far. She’s not a good attorney, but that doesn’t make her dumb.
How do you do this?
We can’t control who is planting what, we have to make it a choice people want to make.
So we need to move all the farms? How does that work?
Well, animals produce methane, which is a significantly more damaging greenhouse gas than CO2 (as it eventually degrades into CO2, whereas combustion of ethanol only results in CO2 and water. Ethanol isn’t perfect, but it’s less damaging than livestock, which also require land, while ethanol does not.
Die anderen haben es schon beantwortet, aber danke, dass du gefragt hast! Ich bin Ausländerin und mache gerade meinen Master im DaF, um Integrationskurse zu unterrichten. Ich mache das teilweise, weil Sachen wie Mülltrennung sehr wichtig für die Integration sind aber auch kaum und unklar in solchen Kursen vermittelt werden.
Ich finde es super schön, dass du diese Informationen selber aussuchst :)
Okay, so we have large numbers of livestock dying of starvation because there are not enough calories in silage to support the livestock we have.
Then because they die unevenly (older and naturally sicklier animals first), they’re still pretty well distributed throughout farms very far from each other.
So now we need to transport our silage further to distribute it to our livestock, who again release a lot of methane in their processing of it.
This means, instead of using silage to make fertilizer or allow tractors to run on ethanol, we send it far away, where it can be used make a lot more contributions to greenhouse gases than we would have if we’d just stop trying to rear animals.
They currently live off of more than our waste products, so feeding them less isn’t going to work. We have to produce so much food to feed them, but we could reduce the amount of land needed for crops if we were only feeding people.
It’s because the French and the English can’t allow the other to win, so we use a third option