• 0 Posts
  • 20 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 12th, 2023

help-circle






  • For real. It’s like SSD manufacturers are in cahoots with HDD manufacturers to never step on their turf(capacity.)

    SSD manufacs keep chasing useless metrics like sequential write speed in consumer drives, when if they just chased capacity they could kill HDDs forever and we’d all be better off for it. Then again, i guess they’d also lose revenue since they don’t nearly die as much as HDDs, so i guess there’s that.

    Or…they could keep with their current trend but actually focus on metrics that matter. Like lower que depth operations which actually make an operating system feel amazing to use like Q1T1. The difference between even an Intel Optane 905p and some of the newest fastest gen4 SSDs currently on the market is still crazy large in terms of how much better the OS feels to use moment to moment for me.


  • Which is why you generally don’t want NVME raid. You’ll never, ever use that much sequential in a consumer environment, and game loading mostly uses random reads rather than sequential. What makes an OS feel snappy and responsive is the lower que depths(i.e q1t1,) which actually get worse or stay about the same when you raid flash together.

    The only time i feel like raiding them together is worth it is if you’re lazy and want one big storage blob, or if you have unique circumstances that demand ridiculous amounts of ingest speed, like with 4k footage.



  • Dual booting to a single drive(or an array) is a recipe for disaster. You’d be much better off putting each OS on it’s own separate drive, and setting arch as the boot distro since grub will allow you to switch to windows if need be. Windows has a tendency to screw with boot partitions so it’s more trouble than it’s worth to install it “alongside” on a single drive/raided drives.

    RAID0 on nvme barely does anything anyways(especially for gaming,) if anything it’s worse as it makes some of the lower que depth operations(and latency) slower.

    So to your question, you can in theory, but ideally you shouldn’t.


  • Not OP, but personally i got bored of windows and wanted more control over my OS, especially as internet surveillance and data harvesting continue to be on the rise.

    In my opinion a lot of the pushback comes from the fact that most distributions(especially recommended starters like Mint) don’t come with the packages you need for gaming out of the box. Things like Lutris/vkd3d/gamescope/dxvk/gamemode/mangohud/WINE/ProtonGE, etc.

    As someone who shifted to linux over the past year or so there was a metric fuckload of things i needed to learn and things i needed to tweak, especially when things went wrong. To the point i have over 10-20k character count tutorials i wrote for myself whenever i need to reinstall from scratch. These days i can get everything up and running fairly quickly, but that initial learning experience wasn’t all fun and games for sure.

    I had a leg up by already having my feet wet in linux server/virtual machines, but for someone who’s coming directly from windows with zero experience and wants things to just work out of the box i can see why so many aren’t interested. It doesn’t help nvidia drivers are still horrible(in terms of desktop feel) for one of the most popular desktop environments for windows converts out there, KDE. Don’t get me started on how you somehow need to know to disable compositing(or toggle via hotkey constantly like i do when i’m forced to use xorg instead of wayland) if you have more than one monitor in KDE or else your FPS will effectively halve itself.

    Linux as a whole has a MASSIVE user experience problem if you want to do anything outside of basic office work and web browsing. Distributions like Garuda(my personal choice) help a lot because they give you the ability to have all of that stuff in the OOBE or an easy to use GUI, but that still only goes so far when little niggling issues crop up and you effectively need to relearn your entire workflow. It’s just not something everybody is willing to do for the sake of not having Satya Nadella know when and where they poop.

    My biggest hope is valve finally publishing SteamOS as an actual desktop OS. Because i know they could do it well as they seem to be keenly aware of the needs of the average gaming user, unlike most distribution maintainers these days which just assume you’re a linux intermediate by default and have completely forgotten the long and arduous path to mastery the OS requires compared to rock-dead-simple windows.






  • Meh, D:OS2 is a great game until the latter 1/4th in my opinion. Act 1/2 are fantastic, act 3 drags a bit and act 4(arx) is the absolute worst in my opinion. I sincerely hope BG3 doesn’t have the same problem, since D:OS1 had a similar issue where it was great until the very end for me(scavenger hunt.) Sadly i dislike the latter parts of each game enough i’m just not inclined to ever replay them. It really soured the whole experience for me unfortunately.

    Arguably the definitive edition makes D:OS2 worse too, since it makes side quests damn near mandatory or else you’ll be constantly underleveled.


  • It absolutely was, hated every second of it, but i did it since i only needed to do it once.

    I wouldn’t put it in the same vein as say, WoW pathfinder if you didn’t play the expansion in question(pure agony and suffering,) but it was still tedious and shouldn’t have been in the game to begin with. It basically forces you to use a guide or else you’re missing out on a ton of potential paragon power/attributes to activate nodes.

    I understand the idea behind “oh let’s put little things around the map and reward players for finding our cleverly hidden bits.” But the reality is that sort of thing is cute at best when it just gives non-essential stuff and horrifyingly frustrating/boring at worst since they decided to tie player power into the equation. The power you get from all of them is not inconsequential if you’re looking to maximize every character you ever make’s potential.