I follow the same philosophy. Avoiding spoilers, there was a part of Act 2 that I thought was just the next conversation in a series of conversations, but it triggered a significant event that blocked me out of several things I had on the to-do list. I had no idea it’d trigger that, and imo I don’t think it’s reasonable that it would happen, so I did scum that.
Never understood the hurry of the crack groups.
You serious?
Obviously the sooner they crack it the sooner they can sell to impatient pirates. The market is only going to decrease over time, and if you’re beaten to the punch you lose out on loads of customers.
The syntax strikes me as a little clunky, but I do like the idea. Coming from Python I’ve used generators a lot (which in my obviously biased opinion is a clearer name that “iterator” here) so recognise the value in having something like that in the language.
Same. Whenever I see messages like his it just smacks of denial / coping strategies. “It’s all those promiscuous women’s fault I can’t get a girlfriend” fuckin grow up.
“Get your evidence away from my beliefs”
This is just provably untrue. You might have more relationship-weighted encounters off-app, but to say that it’s unhelpful if you don’t want a relationship is false.
Not sure if you know this but on the off chance, that’s a deliberate choice by the devs, so it really won’t ever be on sale.
I used to know a guy who worked oil rigs I think six months of the year, earned a ton, then spent his off six months playing EVE Constantly. I think that might be close to the optimal way to play tbh.
You just unlocked that exact same memory, holding the right stick “just so” to make the camera usable. I seem to remember needing to lead turns in the same way too.
Excellent suggestion - it’s much better.
I’m on a Pixel so not sure if what I’m about to say is possible for everyone, but I used “Digital Wellbeing” to set a usage limit of 0 minutes for RiF, then put Jerboa in the same spot. Working for me at least to not have to completely change muscle memory.
Trigger warning: r*ddit link
Same feelings / background here. Navigation will take me a little to grok, but I’m liking it so far.
Why would it be illegal? It’s shitty and it’s obvious what they’re trying to do, but I can’t fathom what law from any jurisdiction this would violate.
That side of it I wholeheartedly agree with. Perhaps I’m just deluding myself into thinking technology awareness early on makes for better legal infrastructure to handle its effect on society. I really would like that to be the case.
But yeah agree, “ChatGPT” being synonymous with “groundbreaking AI” to the vast majority of the public (I suspect) is not great from a monopoly perspective.
On the politicians / rulemakers side of things, that may or may not be a good thing tbh. Technology moves so fast and traditionally the aforementioned groups are glacial and can’t keep up, sometimes to the benefit of a small group, often to the detriment of the majority. Having this on their radar relelatively soon is potentially a useful change.
Pretty much my routine to a tee.