Então devias ter explicitado isso no post. Eu nem li os comentários.
Se queres partilhar uma notícia coloca o link para a notícia e não para o FB sff
It’s not just Americans. Can’t we find a European source that describes this is in a complete and EU POV?
Parece-me porreiro, vou experimentar, obrigado.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Wages in general are much better in the US. But then expenses also tend to be higher, not only health, even the tipping gets crazy expensive. But in the end it’s very personal, what makes you happy? Is it money? Being close to family? Being in your own country? For most people the move would be too troublesome to be worth it, I guess.
Citizenship is easy to get once you already live in the country, not just Portugal, Luxembourg is probably easier even, the language requirement is a low level of Luxembourgish. Of course for that you first need residency. In Portugal is again easy, as long as you have a job contract, Portugal has probably the most liberal migration laws in the EU right now (yeah, wages are low).
Portugal nationality for non-residents is easy as long as you can prove a family connection, that can be a Portuguese granparent or Portuguese Jewish roots (they can be 5 centuries old, is a compensation for inquisition, but you must be able to prove it, a Portuguese Jewish surname helps).
Instead of wasting millions in programs trying to convince people to go back to the countryside, which most don’t want… this is what shoud be done, rewild, give it back to nature.
Surviving the trip from Middle East was the easy part as Belarussia picks them by plane.
But now you have a new danger that doesn’t allow facilitating the passage, how many of these migrants are former Wagner fighters?
Edit: getting down voted for pointing out the Wagner fighters? Thousands of them that entered Belarus and have an unclear future ahead?
That depends a lot of the country. In some EU countries is rather easy and cheap.
“Terrible demographics” will ensure bigger inheritances to Europeans…
Moving abroad is always challenging and not for everyone, some people can’t adapt to a different way of life.
The EU has obviously an interest in getting the UK back in some shape. But I would say that nobody is in a hurry right now. The UK needs to sort itself out, decide what it wants and be consequent and solid about it. There are currently many discussions on the shape and reform of the EU and more people defend the idea of different levels of integration available. From a true federation with single currency in its core, to contries with free border, free movement, common market, but own currency and non-federated. That second tier could be ideal for countries like the UK and Ukraine, at least in the foreseable future.
So it was a bad idea to invest in a terrorist oligarchy? Who could have guessed!? I hope the states will help those poor investors… not.
This is not confirmed yet. And anyway, can you imagine Manfred Webber president of the commission? It would have been so much worse. I’m in favor of the Spitzenkandidat if we get transnational lists and parties running with their European affiliation on the ballot.
Personally I’m glad that at least in some European countries it is NOT a crime to desecrate “holy” things.
The motivation might be different but the result is the same, facilitating the Russian regime financial moves.
The original article by Economist has a paywall, that’s why I posted that one instead, but here’s the link: https://www.economist.com/europe/2023/07/03/-vladimir-putins-useful-idiots
Se a empresa continuar a operar e a operar em Portugal há um benefício estratégico e a médio prazo fiscal para o estado. Isto não são simples contas de mercearia.