The article contains a number of what seems to be assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a behaviour not representative of these people as a group. It’s notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.

We shouldn’t jump to conclusions

Immediately jumps to conclusions

The article states that an mnage was uploaded to X which seemed to imply that US foreign policy resulted in what is currently happening in Gaza, whereas Chinese policy leads to the current prosperity in Xinjiang. Which is quite a frightening comparison.

It’s a gooseberry

Quite literally, I would say.

Everyone having AC is a good way of accelerating climate change

Well of course it will be different. One has to do with another author publishing questionable data and the other would be related to misunderstanding of someone else’s published data. In this case, the use of AI in writing is implied to result in authors not being in control of what they themselves publish.

All of these are bad but do not necessarily arise on purpose. But let’s not add ways to muddy the already mudied waters of science.