“how do you compensate for the fact that your capitalist ideology cares very little for the fact that things valuable in a capitalist economy (resources) are not evenly distributed? how do you compensate for the fact that your communist ideology cares very little for the fact that things valuable in a communist economy (capacity to work) are not evenly distributed?”
The sentence was a custodial jail sentence. There were just two mitigating factors that downgraded it to a suspended one by a whisker: 1. early guilty plea (in the UK this reduces sentence by a third) and 2. first offense. Typically a first offense under two years would be suspended for anyone.
It’s pretty standard to have a first offense under 2 years suspended
Interesting
Be the change you want to see in the world
You would be amazed
TL;DW “after WWII people sought more relaxed casual attire, spent less time exposed to the elements, and rode in cars more where hats were cumbersome”
C is probably closest to reality with light weight ceramics and so on. Though still very very far away from actual reality.
Saw it live in the West End, it’s excellent
Not really. They sound like someone who was raised conservative, thinks the foetus has some sort of status, but thinks they shouldn’t get in the way of others choices.
I went through that stage myself on my way out of evangelical Christianity. I don’t find anything particularly disingenuous about how they’re speaking.
In my experience when showcasing at the end of a sprint it pays to leave the visuals very unpolished and focus on functionality. Even if it’s trivial to use a UI library or other standard components. I deliberately make it look basic to help management / uses accept “it’s working but needs polishing”. That polish might then be me spending 10% of time on neatening UI, and 90% of time refactoring / fixing tech debt.
I wonder if they gave a little because he’d caused so many fact checks they didn’t want the uninformed to mistake it all for being one sided
oh my days
Are you referring to this?
But yet again, for the pro-lifers, murdering babies, no matter how good the results etc might be is fundamentally wrong.
Because that’s very obviously referring to the matter in the way that “pro lifers” would.
And you are ignoring the preceding:
I tend to agree with you that abortion should be available to all who want one because it’s not my damned decision to make.
I would read comments more carefully if you’re going to cast aspersions…
I don’t get what the problem is about this? The last tickets are worth more than the first ones, no?
They could just auction all the tickets, but the result would be the same
You are being perfectly reasonable and coherent by the way. Whoever is downvoting you doesn’t seem to understand the point of discussion.
Sad you’re downvoted for pointing out the truth, it’s not even your opinion!
I’m afraid you are not going to find anything in the brain except “dead molecules”. There isn’t anything in there except the laws of physics and chemistry acting out like clockwork.
But in terms of the scale of how “decisions” work. Then, yes, far simpler decisions (perhaps better to say “reactions”) happen with relatively few neurons. The complete brains of small insects have been mapped by researchers, maybe several million neurons. They can detect movement reactions happening in response to stimuli.
This though is a very different thing to what people mean when referring to their conscious decision to do something.
/thread