I’m commenting this a few times, but Alaska has implemented ranked choice, has a number of environmentalists and does outsized damage to the environment. If they were serious they’d run in state elections there, and four congress there. They are not.
I think ap doesn’t mean advanced placement, but associated press. Or I got whooshed.
I guess this will be the new birth certificate thing for them.
Appropriate content for the publisher
I heard this a couple of days ago, and the more I’m looking into it, the more I find the green party a joke at best.
Alaska has a number of things. A population of conservationists amoung the general population who are likely disaffected. An environment that is being exploited harder than most states. Now ranked choice voting. Most people would see them as the environmentalist party. How much good could they do towards that cause if they got into that state legislature? What if they could take the congress seat or a senator? If they took the electoral votes it would be harder since the ranked choice only seems to be for the states choice, but they could prove they could win at some level. How many candidates are they running in Alaska? One, jill stein. How much effort are they putting in there for her? I can’t tell. The main criticism of them does not exist there, but they aren’t even trying. They can accomplish many of there goals there more easily than anywhere else. It’s the perfect storm for them. Pathetic.
There are two states where ranked choice exists apparently. Are these the states that the third parties are spending money in? They’d be the most likely places for them to win and show they are viable in any way.
It’s my turn to say it now:
Doesn’t he look tired?
The larger plane needed to show dominance
The need for legal immunity is what sent Ceasar to March on rome.
If it was about verifying that votes were legitimate they shouldn’t have a problem appropriating finding so that we go out to every single citizens house and ensure they are issued an ID that is to their standards (which they claim is citizenship). We know it’s actually about ensuring that people who have a difficult time getting an id have a difficult time voting.
Edit. Whoops I spelled some thing wrong
Republicans:“democrats are trying to get ILLIEGALS to vote. We have no proof but ahhhhhhhhh!”
Democrats:“man do you remember how close they were when they were caught on video ACTUALLY STORMING THE CAPITOL BUILDING! I bet that they may try something else, like those fake electors, or…read the article”
It’s the best… the best syphilis anyone’s EVER had… my doctors…you know doctors say I’ve got great syphilis
It took me 30 minutes to get what they meant when they said "reassigned ". I first thought they meant reassigned to the case that made everything else confusing. They meant reassigned to a different case.
I misread lasted as tasted. I’ve never been curious about that.
At least she got contracts. Still a bad guy though.
There are no borders here so my first thought was “what has germany done?”
I don’t like the part about the “dictator”. I would say that that one person’s vote does disrupt this arbitrary definition of fairness of you really think about it, but it doesn’t interrupt my colloquial view of fairness and I’m betting most other people’s.
“Hundreds”? Oh my God there are “hundreds” of them. A solid user base for a social media app there.
He’s not responsible for what his campaign puts out apparently. Beyond that, if he keeps getting pressed and he digs into blaming the family I’d like to see their faces when they continue to support him and deny the reality of the world.
In 2015 the night he announced 2 of his supporters beat a homeless man with a pipe and urinated on him. They turned to the camera and said “trump 2016”. He took days and more than one interview to condemn them. This was before he realized he could lie and misdirect these thing.