The new law that bans gender-affirming care for minors also mandates that adult patients seeking trans health care sign an informed consent form. It also requires a physician to oversee any health care related to transitioning, and for people to see that doctor in person. Those rules have proven particularly onerous because many people received care from nurse practitioners and used telehealth. The law also made it a crime to violate the new requirements.

Another new law that allows doctors and pharmacists to refuse to treat transgender people further limits their options.

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    They came for the people who were disenfranchised and couldn’t vote them out of office.

    Now they’re coming for you because you could have and didn’t.

    Nobody deserves to be treated like this, to have stupid bigoted political games played with their healthcare, but if you were okay with it being done to young people, you at least should not be surprised that now it’s also being done to you.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now, do you really think there are enough trans adults in Florida to vote out the people who created this law? The article doesn’t say they voted Republican and I think we can assume they didn’t. The reason they used the word “blindsided” is because they say the adult aspects of the bill were never part of the public discussion in the news. Of course they could have sought out the full text of the bill, read it and publicized it themselves. But they probably thought they already knew it was a terrible idea without reading past the denial of care to youths. And even if they had risen en masse to protest both new laws, it would only have further energized the red wing who portray them as evil degenerates undermining society.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What a nasty way to respond to a minority losing healthcare access. It’s really easy to sit there and tell them they should have tried harder when you’re not the one doing the work.

      • z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Exactly, this is a farcical argument. The simple fact is that we as a society are only as good as how we treat and support our most disenfranchised people.

        This argument presumes that only trans and a handful of their friends and family members support trans rights and trans integration into broader society, when the truth is that the majority of people want trans integration because we know aforementioned simple fact from having researched, and in some cases lived, the consequences of not standing up for disenfranchised peoples in the past.