And I wish those ‘neighbors’ a lifetime of frustrated celibacy for being assholes. The classy thing to do would have been to give the kid $5 and wish him luck.
When did we go from “the ones not being shitty cops are enabling the ones who are and are therefore bad” to “literally every cop is itching to shoot unarmed harmless ten year olds”
It’s not that every cop is innately murderous, it’s that the institution itself presents violence as it’s main tool and protects its use against scrutiny.
Put another way: to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
ACAB
And I wish those ‘neighbors’ a lifetime of frustrated celibacy for being assholes. The classy thing to do would have been to give the kid $5 and wish him luck.
Removed by mod
Err… /s?
Should have been obvious.
Not at all.
Those same cops would shoot this kid if it were convenient for them. It’s what cops do, at least here in America.
When did we go from “the ones not being shitty cops are enabling the ones who are and are therefore bad” to “literally every cop is itching to shoot unarmed harmless ten year olds”
I think it comes from the perception that in order to survive in a corrupt organisation, one must be willing to be complicit in corruption.
Therefore, they hypothesis is that the “good cops” were weeded out long ago.
It’s not that every cop is innately murderous, it’s that the institution itself presents violence as it’s main tool and protects its use against scrutiny.
Put another way: to a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
Lucky the kid wasn’t walking dogs. Cops would have shot them all. ACAB indeed.