Title text: No, we actually do have a woman who’s basically part of our fellowship. She lives in Rivendell, you wouldn’t know her.

        • Rachelhazideas@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          At no point did I call him a pedophile.

          Feel free to make up other shit while you’re at it.

          I said the words ‘I am not a pedophile.’ because I was being accused of ‘getting on’ on with children.

          • Historical_General@lemmy.worldOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What’s going on now?

            He said, ‘I’m sure we’d get on in person’. You clarified that you were calling him a child in a roundabout way.

            • Historical_General@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You can block them on their profile on desktop at least, and probably elsewhere too.

              You seem to have replied to me by the way. I hope I haven’t been ranting.

                • Historical_General@lemmy.worldOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Her comments are interesting, you should check out the mens liberation stuff. But that pedo comment was easily misconstrued, and she’s been very defensive. She probably doesn’t meet many people like feedum who have an interest in ‘female spaces’, ‘historically accurate’ females and are snarky, since those topics are generally politically anti-feminist.

                  I’m happy to ban people who break the rules too often, but I’d much prefer to have open discussion where everybody learns something or is entertained. The problem is finding the balance between toxicity and rule breaking versus the good stuff.

          • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sorry my words have upset you. We have a slight difference of opinion on something, and that’s okay. I don’t feel it would be productive to continue the discussion, but wish you the best in life nonetheless.

            • Rachelhazideas@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s not clear what you’re apologizing for. I do like how sexism has been reduced to ‘a slight difference of opinion’ now.

              Funny how the discussion was considered productive when your response was ‘Yes, you’re very angry’, and no longer productive when the misogyny was pointed out.

      • Rachelhazideas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tone policing. It’s not aggressive to make sexist claims. It’s only aggressive to point them out.

          • Rachelhazideas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not a pedophile.

            Can you point to the part where I called him a pedophile?

            All I said was that I don’t date children.

            Looks like he gets a free pass for sexism. Lemmy and it’s 77% male userbase at its finest.