psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1675arrow-down162cross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
arrow-up1613arrow-down1external-link"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square122fedilinkcross-posted to: politics@lemmy.world
minus-squareuranibaba@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago but that something trained on public material is privately owned. Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it? I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now? I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI mean, that’s what I mean when I say it was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.
Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it?
I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now?
I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
I mean, that’s what I mean when I say it was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.