Is this really true?

What do you guys on Lemmy say? Most of us are tech people so we are more used to being alone with our thoughts perhaps.

  • ramble81@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    I may be looking at it wrong but there’s an odd flaw to me in the premise. I view “pay money to avoid being shocked” as something that is happening to you, out of your control. Pressing the button, regardless of the outcome, is something you are choosing to do and is most likely a result of curiosity and bordem.

    I think a better approach would have been “if you push this button, the simulation is over and you loose”, and then see what people do.

    • ScrimbloBimblo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also, I think most people are curious. It’s not often you get a chance to electrically shock yourself in a safe environment where you know you won’t be injured.

    • Lith@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This headline makes a ton of assumptions, namely that the ability to feel boredom means that you hate being alone with your thoughts. Of course people who are stuck in a boring ass experimentation room with no stimuli are willing to try out a minor shock. I wouldn’t be surprised if most people would even consider it a fun experience. I know I’ve thought about playing with tasers before.

      Something like “think about your past and explain how you feel, or press this button when you want to end the experiment early at the cost of a shock” would at least be a relevant premise. This is just another benign experiment turned into doomer clickbait, and I wouldn’t let it paint my worldview.