• fxdave@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    23 days ago

    It’s interesting that a closed-source app has good reputation among FOSS enthusiasts. Surely they are not a Microsoft or Apple, but still who controls your computer, you or them?

    • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      It stores your data in plaintext, and simply uses the program to parse special formatting characters. There are no attempts at obfuscation or encryption, and it doesn’t lock you into a walled garden that refuses to play nice with other programs. The program itself is closed-source, but anyone could write an open source version to parse the same info… There just hasn’t been a good reason to do so. Even if Obsidian as a company and program ceases to exist overnight, your data is still safe on your machine and can be read by anyone who cares enough to dig into the file. Hell, you can even open it as the plaintext file and dig through it manually.

    • trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      I just cant wrap my head around why they’re willing to go so far to gain good will from people by having such a generous free tier, but somehow licensing the code under a FOSS license is out of the question??

      Why not just go all the way and make sure everyone who cares about reading the souce could also give you free contributions?

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        Yep and the Android app is full of small things to improve, for sure someone would put in contributions for free

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    24 days ago

    Switched from Onenote to obsidian. There was a small learning curve and I had to install some plugins, but I love it. It looks amazing and runs so much faster than OneNote ever did.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      24 days ago

      I would love to move off OneNote but the lack of alternatives that support inking is disappointing.

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 days ago

        For sure. I’ve been looking for a solid OneNote replacement for a few years now. Inking is the only major barrier.

        I really like OneNote, and I’ve been using it for more than 10 years. But in recent years, my dislike for Microsoft has grown to the point where I feel I need to stop using all their products.

        Right now I’m using xournal++ a lot. It has really excellent drawing functionality; but zero organisational functions. (I’m organising my xournal notes using just file names and folder structure.)

        What I really want is integrated xournal support with Obsidian, or Joplin. In Joplin, I’ve tried inserting a pdf into my notes, and telling Joplin to open the pdf by launching xournal++. That sort of works; but the viewing of the pdf in Joplin shows a window-within-a-window; and the creating of new notes is fiddly; so I decided it wasn’t quite good enough.

    • alphabethunter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Nothing else is changing. No account required, no ads, no tracking, no strings attached. Your data remains fully in your control, stored locally in plain text Markdown files. All features are available to you for free without limits.