• Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    DEI is bad! Treat everyone based on their merits! Remove the bio pages for anyone not white and male!

    … ?

    • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Diversity, equity, and inclusion get in the way of their nepotism and cronyism hiring. If they were hiring based on merit alone there would be no problem being transparent and publishing their hiring decisions.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      It’s been said better by other people but the general understanding of the right’s use of “DEI” is as a convenient blanket slur.

      It’s typically used against Black and Hispanic people the most, followed by trans people, but any/all women are convenient extra padding under the bus tires of their bigotry and insecurity.

      Remember that their fascism is based in feelings of superiority in addition to fear. Use that against the cowardly bastards. They can’t stand to see someone “undeserving” do as well as or better than them, so they try to mow it down.

      Fuck ‘em.

      EDIT: It seems like Rose Ferreira is of Hispanic descent, hailing initially from the Dominican Republic then moved to NY and eventually secured an internship at NASA, and is now an astronomer and aerospace engineer. It seems like her NASA page got reinstated, maybe after backlash. She’s awesome. Hell yeah for the Streisand effect.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        28 days ago

        Oh absolutely. Anyone who rails against “DEI” is by definition a white supremacist.

        • NostraDavid@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          Anyone who rails against “DEI” is by definition a white supremacist.

          This is such a backwards take. “DEI” could always only end in misery, because it pulls people ahead of the line in a time when the working people are already having a hard time. “Is that person hired because of the colour of their skin or the sex of their body, or have they been hired because they’re actually good?”. It could only make a large part of the population feeling left behind because of their sex or race. What do you think that does to the social foundation of a nation?

          Alas, I have no idea what a good alternative would be, but I always recognized “DEI” as a bad idea. I don’t have to be a chef to be able to tell that this dish tastes like ass, even if I can’t cook for shit myself.

          That does not make me (or anyone else who thinks DEI is ass) a white supremacist “by definition”.

          At the end of the day, it’s the ultrarich hoarding all the money that’s the actual issue - an economy that’s not fair to the citizens of the nation. The top 3 wealthiest persons in the USA have the same amount of money as the bottom 50%.

          • SmokeyDope@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            27 days ago

            Careful now thats a nuanced opinion that doesn’t stroke my victim complex or reductively imply anyone who disagrees with me on complex systemic social issues is a nazi supremacist.

            Prepare to be downvoted and hit with five paragraph essay replies picking apart everything you just said. You racist, mysoginistic, hateful, privileged, homophobic, transphobic, double checks progressive slurs & insults 101 field guide uhh third Reich bringing supremacist scum.