Most postings on lemmy are simply Reddit “archive” bots. Why is this so prevalent?

  • Master@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    If anything is going to kill lemmy it will be these low effort content bots. Just post after post of either reddit reposts no one is replying to or random news links no one is replying to. When I scroll lemmy at night before bed 90% of the content is garbage with no comments posted to it.

    It makes me want to go back to reddit in spite of it all.

    • HelloHotel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      ee is trying to fix that, we had a thread about bot infestations. We put rules in place for bot overrunning of feeds

  • Hawke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because people think “content” is what makes this kind of site great. In reality it’s discussion.

    • eee@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, it’s both. There is no discussion without content, so having some content helps to kickstart discussion. But excessive botspam just makes it look even emptier.

      • Hawke@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes you need content, but without the discussion the content is just a firehose of random garbage.

        • eee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          …and without content, there isn’t any discussion to start with.

          like i said, i agree that healthy discussion is the best, but we need something to kickstart it.

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ofc! It’s what made the platform i Refuse Entusiastically During Dis Intervention To Discuss so great!

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lemmit is a scourge. They claim to be trying to “bootstrap” Lemmy by providing content but so much of it is questions with no responses (on Lemmy) or Imgur links to deleted images.

    • Millie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I honestly wish the major instances would ban repost bots. We don’t need to literally copy Reddit to Lemmy. It’s just polluting it.

      • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t see the point in most. Like memes and news maybe but so many posts are meant to drive discussion or is a question

  • jozo@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Day or two a go while browsing feed set to sort all and new, i saw there was a bot posting same news article three different communities, all different instances, and a another bot posting the same exact news article fourth time on the same community that allready posted.

    I dont think it is necessary from bot to post same content on multiple communities.

  • Decoy321@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We’re trying to build communities. A good way to do it is to have bots post content, so there’s stuff to see on our feeds.

    It’s always a balancing act that doesn’t work for everybody. But the beauty here is that each individual can curate their own feed.

    Edit: I misspoke, I’m not someone who actively uses of promotes bot use. I just remember people talking about this discussion previously and this was a justification used. OP asked a question, I provided an answer. It’s not MY answer, but it’s still one. Don’t shoot the messenger.

      • Decoy321@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s entirely understandable. That’s the thing, though. It’s hard to have a community grow on its own, organically, in these times. A large majority of users are rather passive, they don’t actively contribute by posting or commenting so much. If they don’t get enough content on a topic/community, they’ll forget it exists.

        So, to build a community, you get a bot to “seed” it with content until enough people know it exists and contribute stuff themselves.

        It’s weird and fucked and, unfortunately, it’s the world we live in now.

        • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I disagree, it just leads to spam and people blocking the bots, and therefore the communities. I think things will grow organically at whatever speed. People have to realise this isn’t Reddit, and likely won’t ever be as big, and that it’s good that it won’t be.

          • ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            > I disagree, it just leads to spam and people blocking the bots, and therefore the communities.

            Yes, I’ve blocked a number of start up communities because they’ve flooded my feed with posts. Some of them even seemed interesting and I subscribed…only to immediately unsubscribe and block after seeing it has 10 posts an hour with 0 engagement.

          • eee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            > I think things will grow organically at whatever speed.

            No it won’t. Social networks require a critical mass to get started. It’s why platforms like Uber throw money at drivers and consumers at the start - without a critical mass, it won’t work. Spez and his team had conversations with each other using sock puppet accounts during the early days of Reddit.

            • kd637_mi@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair enough, I feel that there are enough people on Lemmy now that it is past the getting started phase though. If new people come on and see bot after bot I feel that it will be a worse experience than having fewer communities with organic engagement.

        • Master@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think this is disingenuous at best. You are creating a ton of content no one cares about and the result is that people are not only blocking the bot but also blocking the bot community. So if you are doing this to “create a community” the result, from my perspective, is that you are aborting the community before it ever gets a chance to start. I know that I wont subscribe to a bot community nor will I in the future go back and check out those communities to see if they are still bots. They are just dead to me at that point.

        • Millie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I block every bot and every bot spam community. We don’t need fake shit here. This isn’t Reddit.

    • The Ape from Space@lemmy.nrsk.no
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      >We’re trying to build communities. A good way to do it is to have bots post content, so there’s stuff to see on our feeds.

      There’s always ups and downs with everything. By using bots you might get subscribers, but people like me who don’t agree with being force fed robot spam will actively avoid such subs.

      In fact I find it so disagreeable I refuse to donate resources so people can host spam on my instance instead of actually posting content themselves.

      I would not like to be part of a community that finds auto-generated content to be of an acceptable quality.

    • Millie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the effect here is more good than bad. Nobody wants to post to a community that’s just bot spam. You’re trying to skip the small community phase in favor of faking being a previous community with bots, but that phase is essential for community development and cohesion.