• Gargleblaster@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Taking covid seriously was not going to save the economy. It would’ve saved lives, but the economic impact of covid was a global one.

    • Zuberi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You forget if we had been inside for 2-4 weeks it would have been over.

      Plenty of other nations were done with it well before us.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Everybody complains about the shut down, but we didn’t have a shut down. Half of Americans kept walking around, fighting mask requirements and coughing on shit deliberately. Schools closed, but so many went to private schools and makeshift daycares, and it wasn’t even the kids spreading it. Doctors stopped seeing patients and sent everyone to the ER. Millions died preventable deaths.

      • th0mcat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        No. You would have had to keep every citizen from every country inside for 2-4 weeks and enforce incredibly strict N95/KN95-only mask policies. If you have a single city not doing zero-COVID in this scenario, you lose containment.

          • th0mcat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            You seem to be stating if the US response had been 2-4 week strict lockdowns that we would have eradicated COVID.

            I am telling you no, it wouldn’t have prevented much unless every single human being on the planet was also in lockdown for the exact same 2-4 week period.

            • Zuberi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Seemed to work for so many countries but sure let’s go w/ that lol. Americans will die on any/every hill.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was only a global impact because of widespread denial of the facts. Trump was at the forefront of that denial from the beginning, and many other countries seemed to follow his lead. Much of global impact could have been avpided entirely of Trump had instead decided to listen to the doctors that actually deal with epidemics and insisted people follow the basic protocols from the beginning before it expanded due to lack of action, instead of vilifying the medical community at every opportunity.

    • Saneless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes but pretending like it didn’t exist and allowing it to spike harder than ever, so bad things has to be shut down, was a big negative impact

      He told his followers it was bullshit and they acted accordingly, spreading it like mad

      • SankaraStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And before people say that it didn’t need to be shut down, they ignore that the hospitals were overwhelmed and could have been even more overwhelmed if we didn’t have mask mandates and/or lock downs. People were being denied health care because the hospitals had no space.