• SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think cuffing and taking an 11-year-old to juvie for being an idiot is completely unnecessary.

    I also don’t see anything in the article about investigating whoever it was that was encouraging the prank.

    • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My issue is not so much that she was taken to juvie. That’s a solid lesson in not make false crimes with really no impact at this age. My issue is that she’s still there. Where are the parents? Why can’t she be released. A little scare is one thing, but I don’t think an 11 year old should really be held all the way until trial for a misdemeanor that was dumb and not malicious.

      • toastio@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree with your overall points but wanted to call out that she got hit with a felony and a misdemeanor.

        I don’t really know the ins-and-outs of the legal system, but I really hope that felony charge gets reduced or, at a minimum, doesn’t follow her around into adulthood. Would be a shame for her record to be marred like that long-term for a misguided prank pulled when she was 11.

        • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Literally any felony including murder gets sealed and wiped away in adulthood. There is no impact to this.

      • ShadowRunner@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Your issue is that she’s still there? The article implies that this only happened yesterday, so she’s only been there for 1 day. That’s not unreasonable for a felony.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          One day could be more than enough to traumatize a kid. She’s 11 and she played a very stupid prank likely because she didn’t understand the consequences due to being 11 years old. She doesn’t need to be put with 16-year-old violent offenders. Not even for a day.

          My daughter is a very well-behaved kid, but she also has terrible anxiety. If, by some similar incident that she didn’t realize was so serious, she ended up in juvie for a day, she would end up with PTSD.

          • ShadowRunner@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I understand what you’re saying completely. I’m not even saying that I disagree with you - to be honest, I’m not quite sure what to think about this circumstance.

            However, I will say that there are limits to being lax on someone just because they are a child. This was a serious offense that could have cost multiple people their lives and a serious response is justifiably warranted.

        • Iteria@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. She’s 11 and didn’t commit a violent crime. I expect she would be taken into custody, paperwork filed and then released into her parent’s care. That’s normally how it works for non-violent offenses especially for first time offenders.

          • ShadowRunner@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If we were talking about shoplifting, sure. This case is more serious, however, and I’m not sure the same approach would be taken under the circumstances.

    • PenguinJuice@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see some value in it. Don’t keep her overnight or cause permanent damage to her life, but these kids are for sure a little out of control and unparented.

      • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Eh, I doubt it’s because she’s “out of control and unparented”. According to the article she was at home with her parents when she decided to copy a prank she saw in a youtube video. The whole incident played out in under 90 minutes, even the best parent can’t (and shouldn’t) watch their kid 100% of the time. Kids have poor impulse control and do dumb shit. Give her a stern talking to and a slap on the wrist, and call it a day.