And what’s you evidence that we aren’t doing it? You’re probably one of those guys that think Congress is trying to take attention away from the Biden family 😂
Watch the Dr. Greer podcast on the Shawn Ryan show, educate yourself a bit, then come back.
Um… how do you think they survive interstellar travel at relativistic speeds and not be shielded from a constant barrage of micrometeors? Do they steer around them?
Another dishonest tactic - deflecting to an unimportant part of the argument to hold up the participant with needless explanations for metaphorical concepts.
What the other user meant is that all we know about space travel is, that we need a lot of protective layers around our crafts just for leaving the atmosphere, so one would assume that craft that supposedly travel hundreds of light-years would need a very sophisticated kind of protection. But there is no way to deliver evidence to a theoretical concept, hence why I said your arguing is in bad faith my dear.
edit: and now he takes the cowards way out of a failing argument by deleting his comments. That’s another tactic - ending the conversation, rendering all our arguments worthless and essential wasting our time. Jean Paul Sartre described it well in his quote about anti semitism.
Directed energy weapons are used to shoot them down. Not rockets. If you are uneducated on the topic just say that…
Please do show your evidence that “directed energy weapons” are shooting down alien spacecraft all over the planet.
You gotta let these folks have their fun. Directed energy weapon space invader wars is (Usually) one of the least dangerous conspiracies out there.
I’m just a stickler for needing evidence for extraordinary claims. I can’t help it, it’s pathological.
And what’s you evidence that we aren’t doing it? You’re probably one of those guys that think Congress is trying to take attention away from the Biden family 😂
Watch the Dr. Greer podcast on the Shawn Ryan show, educate yourself a bit, then come back.
That’s not how the burden of proof works. You made the claim, it’s not my job to prove you aren’t lying.
And no, I think congress is just full of nutcases and I’m not going to watch some person blathering on a podcast because that proves nothing.
You actually made the claim, so I’ll be waiting for my evidence.
What claim do you think I made?
Wheres your evidence that these UFO’s have shields to protect them from micrometeorites? Thats a pretty bold claim there, buddy…
Um… how do you think they survive interstellar travel at relativistic speeds and not be shielded from a constant barrage of micrometeors? Do they steer around them?
Still waiting on your evidence instead of another bold claim. What’s the matter? Don’t have any?
My evidence for what?
Your outrageous claims 😂
Another dishonest tactic - deflecting to an unimportant part of the argument to hold up the participant with needless explanations for metaphorical concepts.
What the other user meant is that all we know about space travel is, that we need a lot of protective layers around our crafts just for leaving the atmosphere, so one would assume that craft that supposedly travel hundreds of light-years would need a very sophisticated kind of protection. But there is no way to deliver evidence to a theoretical concept, hence why I said your arguing is in bad faith my dear.
edit: and now he takes the cowards way out of a failing argument by deleting his comments. That’s another tactic - ending the conversation, rendering all our arguments worthless and essential wasting our time. Jean Paul Sartre described it well in his quote about anti semitism.
Which claims are those? Please quote them.
Read up? Are you slow?