• Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have yet to see mass adoption of “Luigi is a terrorist” amongst the US population. In fact, quite the opposite.

    • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The real hero is…WTF. How come we don’t provide Luigi with billions in armament to see if he can take down the healthcare monopoly?

      The war against high healthcare cost. Sounds reasonable to me. Like the first retaliation strike against Palestine seemed reasonable to me. But then Nathan Yahoo kept going and by the third day I was like dude WTF! But what did we do? We kept helping! WTF again! Then it was kids getting followed by drones and blown up to pieces. WTF!

      Now Luigi comes along and fights against something that actually makes a difference for us the regular people and he gets to become the incarcerated person? The criminal? This is wrong. I hope Trump pardons Luigi. If not because Trump wants to do the opposite of what Democrats do, then maybe because the syphilis is eating his remaining brain cells. If he did, he would probably win the public like no one has ever bigly won the public ever before by gerrymandering the fuck out of every county. It’s a great middle finger to be given where I would care that it happened.

      • uberfreeza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Not likely. In an interview, Trump said people supporting Luigi is a “sickness.” Which makes sense, because he’s entirely disconnected from reality.

    • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      57
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Yes, but the legal system does not act on the whims of mass adoption. It’s like that mom in Florida who got slapped with terrorism charges for telling blue cross blue shield the deny, defend, depose line over the phone. The harsh crimes are there to chill anyone who might step out of line.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        I feel like we, as a society, should agree on a set of rules and laws, that we adhere to in order to ensure acceptable conduct and behavior.

      • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yes, but the legal system does not act on the whims of mass adoption.

        Locke and Rousseau want to know your location

        • xenomor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Peasant brain mentality.

          If she said, “I’m going to come kill you.” That would be a threat. Her saying, “actions like what you are doing have gotten people like you killed” or even “you deserve to be killed” are just observations, warnings at most, but not threats.

          • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            You seem to forget that mass shootings are an almost daily occurrence in this country.

            Quoting an assassin, then telling a call center worker that they’ll all be next should only ever be taken as a threat.

            If she had said, “Your company’s actions might cause someone to commit further violence,” this wouldn’t have been news, but there is no reality where her statement alone should be taken as just an observation.

            She intended to make the person on the other end of the line and the people they work with afraid, and that’s a crime.

            Those people probably didn’t even directly work for UHC, so it’s not even like she was telling anyone who could remotely do anything about it.

            • xenomor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              It’s not a crime to make people afraid. It’s provocative, perhaps rude, usually inappropriate, but not a crime. Your paraphrase is exactly the meaning of what she said. There is so much misplaced outrage in this country and this thread. There are people and organizations actively killing and hurting people, and that’s all acceptable to the prevailing culture here. It is appropriate to call them out for their awfulness. If that scares them, that’s a good thing.

        • Euphorazine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          “You people are next” is a threat based on your own position of power. A politician saying that, yeah that’s a threat. Some random person saying it someone else, not so much.

          If someone has a recording of an ex saying that to them over the phone, the best you’re getting is a restraining order, if you get anything at all.

          Maybe if she said “I’m coming for you next”, then that would have more weight. But now we’re in hypothetical land, so who cares.