• ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not a lawyer and haven’t read through the court documents, but from legal commentators it seems that Google provides the general steps for how their algorithms work in plain language for the judges to consider. Even then, the Supreme Court itself has stated they have no clue how technology works so this is difficult for them to rule on

    • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What prevents Google from lying about how their algorithms work, though? How could it actually be verified? There’s no way it could just be as simple as they give their word and suddenly that’s good enough for a court ruling?