Lib Dem leader says people lending their votes to rival parties could shut the door on Conservatives at Westminster for years to come

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In terms of theoretical numbers, sure. But 1) the Labour government will never put this motion forward i.e. dead before it’s started and 2) even if they were shamed into doing this they would whip so hard that there won’t be any dissent. So it doesn’t matter what the SNP and Lib Dem support would have been. That’s what is so utterly depressing about this. This should be front and centre in Labour’s drive for election. They can even spin it as a way of keeping the union together. But they’ll say more about ULEZ before they say anything about this. A generation wasted… again.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Oh, that really is depressing. I suppose our only hope is that the voices asking for it grow loud enough then… I’m too young to remember last time – do you think PR has become more of a mainstream issue in recent years? Because I’ve heard articles in the guardian as well as a people around me mentioning it

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        do you think PR has become more of a mainstream issue in recent years? Because I’ve heard articles in the guardian as well as a people around me mentioning it

        I don’t think it has. The previous AV referendum had the same level of fringe interest too around a similar stage to this. The Lib Dems were the ones to push it through in coalition and against heavy opposition from the Tories (who watered it down) and veiled opposition from Labour (who like the EU question didn’t do jack shit and sat on the fence) so it absolutely tanked. It didn’t help that thousands of student voters saw this as an opportunity to “fuck tuition fees” and vote against anything supported by the Lib Dems. Since then I don’t think a lot has changed in terms of coverage or main stream support. And, you know, that other referendum happened…

        For example: how often do you hear about this on the daily news cycle versus hearing about anything Brexit related? Instead of XYZ news story can be partly blamed on Brexit do you ever hear ABC news story might have been different and more equitable under PR? Literally every single political and economic story needs to be about this for a sustained amount of time before this becomes mainstream again. Or Labour needs to swallow their pride and force the issue for the sake of the country.

          • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Amongst the names for No to AV / supporter of FPTP this name pops up: Rachel Reeves. Where have seen that before 🧐?

            • theinspectorst@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Not on the list, but Andy Burnham was Labour’s election campaign coordinator at the time and played the critical role in getting Labour’s party machinery to ignore the referendum (which is what allowed all these Labour MPs to freely campaign for FPTP).

              So I’ve been very sceptical about his Damascene conversion to electoral reform now that he’s in a job that has no influence over the matter…

          • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Oh shit, you’re right. Somehow I’d softened it in my head. I think we can see how this is going to go again. It’s incredibly incredibly disheartening. We’ll be trapped in tribal politics forever.