MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 days agoMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayexternal-linkmessage-square163fedilinkarrow-up1946arrow-down119
arrow-up1927arrow-down1external-linkMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-26 days agomessage-square163fedilink
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up33arrow-down1·5 days agoIt works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·5 days agoIt works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·5 days agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 days agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
minus-squareFridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·5 days agoWell, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
It works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
It works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
Well, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol